Canon EOS M Camera, Mirrorless

Canon EOS M : New Canon EOS Mirrorless System

Canon EOS M Mirrorless Camera in Black or White

The “M” may not really stand for “mini”, but the new EOS M is essentially a miniature version of the new Canon Rebel T4i.

This morning Canon (finally!) announced their entrance into the mirrorless camera market with the EOS M camera. The new model features a large 18 megapixel, APS-C sensor, the same size as those found in most Canon SLRs (specifically, it is a hybrid phase-detect CMOS like that found in the new Canon T4i), a touch sensitive LCD,  full HD video recording with stereo sound, interchangeable M-mount lenses including two new STM (stepping motor) lenses: a 20mm pancake lens, and an attractive 18-55mm zoom, and an adapter so that the camera can use any of your EF or EF-S mount Canon lenses.

Canon EOS M with EF Lens Adapter
Fitted with the EF Lens Adapter, it is easier to appreciate how compact the EOS M body is: a standard 50mm f/1.8 lens would appear quite large in comparison.

Additionally (and unlike Nikon’s disappointing “1” series), the Canon EOS M has a standard hot shoe which is compatible with the full line of Canon’s Speedlite flashes and, of course, radio triggers like the ever-popular Pocket Wizard.

Canon’s mirrorless offering will offer stiff competition to Sony’s NEX series cameras, also an APS-C line, and many of the diminutive sensored products from Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus, and other Micro 4/3rds compatible ranges. Specific model comparisons will appear here over the few weeks.

Although not expected to hit store shelves until October, the EOS M will be available in black, white, red, and silver, and competitively priced at $799 when bundled with the 20mm pancake lens. The EF to EF-M mount adapter should cost roughly $199.

Canon EOS M Top and Rear View

Editor-in-Chief
  1. Can you imagine the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L Mk II on this thing? :-) People will be, like, “why are you carrying a lens with a lens cap?”

    For some reason, aesthetically it needs something to be desired, though the advent of the EF adapter makes it very interesting.

    1. As a matter of fact…

      It makes the 70-200 look like a 400mm f/2.8 :) With a 50mm f/1.4, though, or 85mm, it would still look pretty reasonable, though, I think… and probably are more practical for this kind of camera.

        1. That’s a true photo of the setup, courtesy of Canon. Actually, I suppose it’s possible that Canon faked it… but it is ostensibly a real photo. (Actually, they have photos of the M with several different lenses… including the 55-250 and an 18-135).

          I thought this one was interesting, too:

          That’s a little 60mm macro lens :)

  2. This is a fascinating development!

    But I do like availability of a viewfinder, even if electronic.

     

    G

    1. I agree; a viewfinder (or even a rangefinder) would be a big help. It may be available as an add-on in the future; some mirrorless cameras have hot-shoe mounted electronic viewfinders with a cord to the camera’s USB or HDMI port for a video feed. I guess I wouldn’t hold my breath, though.

      The Sony NEX-7 is the only competitor that I can think of that actually has a viewfinder. It’s a great camera all-around, too… it would be hard for me to choose the EOS M over the Nex-7, though it is considerably more expensive.

      (Of course, the Nikon 1 V1 also has a viewfinder, but it also has a much smaller sensor than the Canon or Sony).

      – Matt

      1. I thought the same thing about the hoodman option, but i’m not sure it really makes sense to carry around such a large cup-style eyepiece for a compact camera. In volume, it seems that it would be at least as large as the camera itself… and with something that large, it might make more sense to just use an SLR.

        Still, it’s an impressive little camera.

        – Matthew

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *