Tamron 17-28mm f2.8 Di III RXD Banner

Tamron Announces 17-28 f/2.8 for Sony FE, 35 f/1.4 and 35-150mm F/2.8-4 for DSLRs

If you're a fan of Tamron's 28-75 f/2.8 lens for Sony E-Mount, then there's some good news headed your way.

One of the most exciting announcements of this winter’s expo season is the Tamron 17-28 f/2.8 Di III RXD ultra-wide zoom lens for full-frame Sony E-mount, announced tonight in anticipation of the WPPI and CP+ shows next week. While not quite as wide as Sony’s expensive 16-35 zooms, it is dramatically smaller and lighter, and will likely be significantly less expensive. Also announced this evening are two lenses for DSLRs: a new 35mm f/1.4 anniversary lens, and a 35-150 f/2.8-4 “portrait” lens.

Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Tamron 17-28 f/2.8 Di III RXD

Few specifics are currently available for the Tamron 17-28 f/2.8 lens at this time. Tamron describes the lens as lightweight and compact, with 67mm filter threads (the same as the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8). The “RXD” is a somewhat forced abbreviation for “Rapid eXtra-silent stepping Drive”, a fast and quiet precision motor that should be ideal for photography and video.

Matthew Gore | Light And Matter Just eyeballing it, it appears that the new 17-28 f/2.8 will be about 3/4″ (2 cm) shorter than the 28-75 f/2.8.

It’s hard to make estimates from a photograph that may or may not be identical to the production lens, but it appears that the 17-28mm lens will be smaller than the already compact 28-75mm lens: about the same diameter but 3/4 of an inch (2cm) shorter.

And while the Sony 16-35 f/2.8 GM is known for its exceptionally high quality optics and has a longer zoom range, it appears that the Tamron 17-28 will also be about 2cm shorter and perhaps 1/2 pound lighter. And $1000 less expensive? Let’s hope. I’ll pick up as many details as I can at WPPI next week.

Tamron 17-28 f/2.8 next to Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 at WPPI
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter For size comparison, the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 on display next to the 28-75mm f/2.8 at WPPI in Las Vegas, Feb 28th, 2019.

Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD

Marking the 40th Anniversary of their “SP” lens line, Tamron have announced the SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD lens as a culmination of everything that they’ve learned about lens design in the past four decades. Tamron claims that it will provide users “unprecedented high-resolution image quality and beautiful, appealing background bokeh” in a focal length that can be appreciated by just about any type of photographer, from photojournalists to commercial and portrait photographers. Considering the performance of Tamron’s existing SP lenses (particularly the 85mm), “unprecedented” resolution is a very high bar.

Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Tamron 35-150 f/2.8-4 Di VC OSD

Tamron is marketing their new 35-150mm f/2.8-4 zoom as a “portrait” lens, as it includes the 85mm range along with other focal lengths that are popular with portrait shooters, and it may prove convenient for those who wish to capture their subjects with some depth of field (though photographers enthralled by the current “bokeh” fad will surely be unmoved). For close ups, the lens can focus down to just 17.7 inches, even at the 150mm end.

Image Courtesy of Tamron USA

The 35-150 is the only lens of the bunch to include image stabilization, for which Tamron has included a dual processor to improve performance, along with autofocus.

Price & Availability

For the moment, Tamron has not released prices for any of these lenses, and is saying only that they’ll be available in the middle of 2019. If the 17-28 is priced under $1000 like the 28-70 f/2.8, it will undoubtedly be just as hard for the shops to keep in stock, and an ultra-high quality 35mm lens is always welcome, though I do wish that it had stabilization like their f/1.8 model.

What do you think? Are you as excited about the 17-28 f/2.8 for Sony FE as I am?


Editor-in-Chief
  1. The price of the 17-28 in a shop never will be 1000€ or 999€. It will be around 799-899€ and i think it will be 799$ – 899$, too. The Tamron 28-75 had the same price of 1000€ at announcement and it was never that expensive in the end. The 17-28mm looking really good and really small and light. Matt Granger has a video online from march 3rd where he has it on a camera and in his hands.

    Now, lets see how much will the 70-200 or the 75-210 or 75-200 will weight. Actual i am buying a Sony 70-200 F4 because of the weight. And when the Tamron is under 1 kilogram it will be a game changer! But i dont think it will be under 1200g.

    1. It’s good to hear that these things are out in the wild already. Tamron will be sending me one as soon as they’re available in the USA, but as of a couple of weeks ago at WPPI, the only one that they had was behind glass, and it was the only lens that I wasn’t allowed to put on my camera.

      I would love a 70-200 f/2.8 from Tamron that is nice and compact, as long as it is built to take a beating, since that lens is my workhorse, and I’m not always easy on equipment.

  2. I am really looking forward to the new Tamron 17-28. I did a lot of research on the 28-75 before purchasing it (including reviewing your Youtube review and comparison to the GMaster 24-70), and am really happy with it. It almost looks to me that the 17-28 may have internal zooming. We shall see. Looking forward to seeing some more of your upcoming content.

    1. Hey Tyler,
      Me too! I’m at WPPI in Las Vegas right now, and I talked to my contact at Tamron for a good half hour about the 17-27, but there wasn’t a whole lot to add yet. I did take a photo of the two lenses next to each other so that I could get a better idea of the size difference, but the lenses were behind glass, and it didn’t turn out very well. We’ll know more soon, though.

      – Matthew

      1. Hi Matthew,
        I am not thrilled to hear rumors of Tamron setting the MSRP to 1000 Euros (currently ~ $1125). I would expect it to be within a $100 dollars of the 28-75 – and most likely less than the 28-75 with the limited zoom range. I also think they need to consider that Sony’s 16-35 2.8 costs a couple hundred less than the 24-70 2.8.
        Tyler

        1. I haven’t heard anything credible about USA pricing, yet, so I guess I’ll just have to wait and see and hope that it’s reasonable, though even at $1200 I’d be OK with it, considering the alternatives. Actually, that would make it about the same price as the Sony/Zeiss 16-35 f4.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *