A fisheye photo of the Samyang display.

Photokina: Probably the Last of It

I just got out of an Adobe “Press Only” press conference. We heard from a few different people, but including Elia Locardi of Fstoppers (semi)fame. Adobe has made two announcements this week: first, the iOS version of Lightroom now support RAW files, and their LR cameras can shoot Adobe DNG format RAW photos. This has been available on Android for several months, but many Apple aficionados have been eagerly awaiting this development.

Their second announcement was about the Adobe Stock Photo program upgrade, which uses a remarkable algorithm to auto-tag your images, streamlining the upload process so that you can spend more time shooting and less time selling. You can upload your images directly from Lightroom, and the website will then analyze the photo and detect the subject, dominant colors, and themes. According to today’s speakers, the Adobe system can tag photos more effectively than the majority of Adobe Stock photographers.

zeiss-milvus-85m-f1-4-test-1
As was common with this lens, I missed focus… slightly. And that was enough.

One of the great things about Photokina, perhaps the only real advantage that is has over domestic expos like PDN’s PhotoPlus, is that it has an equipment loaning service: I can pick up any of dozens of lenses from the major manufacturers, along with a more limited number of cameras, and test them out all day… for free. In fact, the only deposit is my ID.

Most of the available lenses are ones that I’ve spent a considerable amount of time with already, but I rarely shoot with Zeiss lenses, so today I picked up a Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 and tracked down a couple of the models that I’ve become familiar with.

The lens is huge and heavy. Perhaps it’s the fact that I’ve been traveling for over a week, but I’m not as tolerant of heavy glass as I once was. Unlike autofocus lenses, the focus throw on the Zeiss is very long; it takes a couple of twists of the wrist to get from one end to the other. This allows for very fine focus control, but it also makes it very slow to focus… especially with moving subjects and in crowds. I missed focus frequently.

I also spent some time visiting lens manufacturers that are either very small or that otherwise aren’t as useful to me. I checked out Samyang’s lineup, including a fun fisheye zoom, and their new autofocus lenses (on Sony).

And for the first time, I believe, I held a Russian ZENIT lens in my hand (and put it on my camera). The people working the booth completely ignored me. I have no idea what they were doing, but they were very distracted. So I didn’t wait for permission to use the lenses that were out on display. I took a picture of the only other guy who came up to lean on their counter. The lens impressed me about as much as their customer service did.

As a final note, I will leave you with this: a brief comparison of a photo from Samyang’s 12mm fisheye and the 12mm end of Sigma’s new 12-24mm f/4 ART zoom.

First, here’s the Samyang:

A fisheye photo of the Samyang display.
A fisheye photo of the Samyang display.

And here’s the Sigma, at 12mm:

Not only did I capture this poor fellow removing his jacket, I got him with a big flower sticking out the top of his head. You can get an idea of the distortion characteristic, though.
Not only did I capture this poor fellow removing his jacket, I got him with a big flower sticking out the top of his head. You can get an idea of the distortion characteristic, though.

And now that I’ve come all this way, I think I’ll go spend some time taking pictures in the city of Cologne, tomorrow. After I look up what the street photography laws are around here.

Editor-in-Chief
  1. Sorry, but the Russian lens’ looks need something to be desired. Also, I don’t see an advantage the fish-eye provides if the field of view seems pretty much the same. I guess you get the distortion. Perhaps I’m missing something.

    And the “flower guy”, though unfortunate, is really his fault for not being cognizant of his surroundings.
    :-)
    So, the Milvus 85mm, is that a manual focus only lens? Because the Canon 85mm f1.2 also took FOREVER to focus in both manual and AF. I guess what I’m asking is, manual focus lenses usually have short throws. Surprising, the Fuji XF 56mm f1.2 (85mm equiv) is very quick as a manual focus lens.

    Just curious.

    1. No, with a fisheye, the distortion can be sorta fun and create an interesting look, if you like that sort of thing. It’s also cheaper and easier to make than a rectilinear corrected lens. So, yes… the Sigma will be $1200 and I’m not sure about the Samyang, but I’d guess it’s between 1/3 and 1/2 of that price. Maybe less.

      I edited that picture and only just noticed that he’s not actually taking off a jacket… it’s just a backpack.

      The Milvus is manual focus only. But in my experience, autofocus lenses generally have much shorter focus throw so that AF is faster (since precision isn’t a problem) whereas manual gives you more room for getting it just right with a longer throw. I’m sure there are exceptions. I don’t remember every trying to manually focus the Canon 50 1.2 or the 85 1.2

      I took a whole bunch of illegal pictures today (ie, pictures of Germans without getting their permission first). I’m fleeing the country in the morning. I hope that a couple of them are good pictures.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *