Nikon D5300 Front View

Nikon Announces D5300 SLR With Same Sensor As D7100, and AF-S 58mm f/1.4 Lens

This evening, Nikon announced the latest model in the D5000 series: The Nikon D5300. Appearing less than a year after the announcement of its predecessor, the D5200, it’s not surprising that the D5300 appears to simply have a few gizmos tacked on rather than a fresh, new design.

They’re not bad gizmos, though. The D5200’s 24-megapixel sensor has been replaced by D7100‘s 24-megapixel sensor, which lacks an optical low-pass filter (aka anti-aliasing filter) for increased sharpness. Anti-Aliasing filters are actually an expensive component to produce, so much so that they have never been a feature of medium-format sensors, so Nikon’s accountants are undoubtedly happy that AA-free sensors are becoming the chicken-wings 1 When I was a kid, chicken wings were not much more than butcher’s scraps, but during the 1990s, the wing-fad elevated them to the degree that today, a single chicken wing costs more at McDonalds than a double cheeseburger. of the 2010s.

In addition to the new sensor the D5300 now boasts on-board GPS for tagging images, and built-in Wi-Fi.  While these are both very useful tools, they’d have been somewhat more impressive in an age when disposable, pre-paid cell phones didn’t carry the same features for $50.

The D5300 also has received a processor upgrade, now with the Expeed 4 under the hood. While the processor may have a little extra work to do handling the potential moire from the new sensor, there are no other obvious benefits: the frame rate remains the same (with a maximum of 5 fps), as do the camera’s other essential stats.

It is hard to believe that Nikon will sell many of these cameras, though, since this beast will NOT be available in metallic brown! Good Lord, Nikon… what were you thinking?

Nikon AF-S 58mm f1.4G
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Also announced this evening is a new large aperture prime lens: the AF-S 58mm f/1.4.  Nikon’s timing here is remarkable; it was only weeks ago, when I was in the middle of a shoot with my Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.4G lens, when I found myself saying “Aaargh! If only this lens could give me an extra 8mm of reach!” And already, my dreams have come true.

But while the 50mm lens may find favor with the masses with it’s price point under $450, the 58mm model will appeal to those photographers with real taste at a paltry $1700 when it hits store shelves later this month. Nikon justifies this price with claims of the lens’s high resolving power and lack of “sagital coma”.

UPDATE:

If you’re interested in why the Nikon 58mm f/1.4 is so expensive, I recommend reading an interview posted by Nikon about the lens’ design. It is interesting and informative, and explains what makes this lens different from other prime lenses.

Editor-in-Chief
  1. Hello,

    Trying to decide between Nikon D5300 and Canon t5i with similar lens 18-140mm or 18-135mm. This will be my first DSLR camera and I will be shooting, travel (landscape) portraits, and some sports (waterskiing/hockey). My concern is the image quality with larger prints, especially with the watering photos. Do you recommend one over the other for this purpose specifically?

    Thanks well in advance for you advice,

    Kelsie

    1. Hi Kelsie,

      Either camera should be great for the things you mention. If you’re able to fill the frame with your subject (and not crop too much of the frame away), you’ll be able to make giant prints using either camera, assuming that you’ve taken good, sharp images. I’ve made 30-inch prints from 12 megapixel files, so with 18 or 24, you’ll be fine.

      However, if you end up cropping away a lot of the frame, you drop down in image quality very quickly. For example, if you start with an 18 megapixel file, and you crop off just 10% around the edges, it becomes an 11 megapixel file… and if you crop in 15% from each edge, it becomes an 8.7 megapixel file… IE, you’ve lost 50% of your sensor’s resolution already.

      So, what’s really important is filling the frame with your subject, and to do that, you need the right lens for the job. The 18-140/135mm are roughly equivalent; the Nikon is a 210mm equivalent and the Canon is a 216mm equivalent, since Canon and Nikon have different sensor sizes. For water skiing images, it will depend on where your’re shooting from. If you’re on the boat, and the tow rope isn’t too long, a 135/140mm should be just fine. From the shore, it will probably be a bit short on either camera, sometimes. For hockey, it’s going to even harder because indoor rinks have terrible light, usually (not to the naked eye, but to a camera). For those situations, you’d ideally want a lens that lets in more light (like an f/2.8 lens) and a longer focal length (like a 200 or 300mm). A good choice would be something like the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD, which is much less expensive than the Canon or Nikon equivalents.

      Yes, even the Tamron is expensive. There are other options that will give you more light (85mm f/1.8 lens is cheaper, tons of light, or you can use flash…), but my advice is always this: buy the least expensive camera that meets your needs, and the best lenses that you can afford. The lenses are more important and will last longer than the body.

      Good luck!

      – Matthew

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *