Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO DX II

Tokina Announces the AT-X 11-16mm f/2.8 PRO DX II

Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO DX II
Matthew Gore | Light And Matter

Building on the success of the original, today Tokina/Kenko has announced the release of the AT-X 116 PRO DX II, an 11-16mm f/2.8 lens with improved optics and focusing.

The original Tokina AT-X PRO 11-16mm f/2.8 lens was already one of the best… perhaps the best… lenses in it’s class. Although several competing lenses exist with larger zoom ranges, such as the Canon 10-22, the Nikon 10-24, and the Sigma 10-20, only the Tokina offers a constant f/2.8 maximum aperture. Perhaps because it’s zoom range is less ambitious, it’s optical quality is excellent. It has been popular enough that since its introduction in 2008, the lens has frequently been hard to find in stock, and the prices (especially for the Canon model) have fluctuated wildly.

Initial information from Tokina’s Japanese website indicate that Nikon-mount version of the lens will be available in March, with an MSRP of 90,000 Yen (roughly $1150 USD), which is the same as that of the original model. As usual, though, street prices are significantly lower, with the lens typically selling for around $700. The Canon version, unfortunately, is not expected to be released until next July. It is also possible that these dates refer only to availability in Japan, and the lenses may not be released in the USA until later.

Details about the new lens are still a little sketchy, and have not yet been officially released in English. There are a few main differences that seem to be clear, however. The lens has been treated with a newly developed coating to improve shadow detail and tonal gradations. Even more importantly, the lens has been redesigned with a new aspherical glass element and two new low-dispersion (near-fluorite) glass elements which are intended to eliminate chromatic aberration (color fringing in areas of high contrast). Additionally, the lens will feature a newly designed silent-drive motor, and a GMR sensor, both of which will improve focusing speed.

I’m looking forward to getting my hands on one of these. With any luck, everyone will benefit: those willing to spend the money will get a great new lens, and with any luck, beginners and starving artists will be able to get the (still very high quality) original models at lower second-hand prices.

— UPDATE —

[I received the following email this evening from Tokina’s Japanese HQ – JMG]

As of today, AT-X116II has been announced for Japan market only, and the launch for overseas market has not been fixed yet.

Thank you in advance for your kind understanding.

Best regards,

Tokina Sales

Kenko-Tokina Co.,Ltd.,3-9-19,Nishi-otiai,Shinjyuku-ku,Tokyou 161-8570 Japan

Editor-in-Chief
  1. Hi Matthew,The next lens I purchase will be the Tokina 11-16mm for my Canon 60d. I notice there is a significant price difference between the two newer and older model. Now that the new one has been out a while, do you know if there an appreciable difference between the two? The older one fits my budget much better but I want to make sure there is not a big difference in the quality. Do you have an opinion on that?

    Thanks!

     

    1. Hey Glen, Unfortunately, I still haven’t had a chance to spend any significant amount of time with the Mark II. However, what I’ve read and heard is that the optical differences between the two lenses is very minor; in some tests, the older lens tests as being slightly sharper at some parts of the zoom, but the new lens is more consistent across the range. So, if optical quality is your concern, I wouldn’t worry about getting the new lens… the old one was great. The new one does have a better AF motor, though the old one was not bad.

      Another option to consider is the Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 . It’s not quite as sharp as the Tokina and doesn’t give you f/2.8,, but it’s a couple hundred less and has better controlled chromatic aberration than the Tokina… it’s a close second.  Actually, I see that the new Tokina is only $599 on Amazon at the moment, so maybe the Sigma is temporarily more expensive…- Matt

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *