Nikon D5300 vs D7100
Camera Comparisons
·8 min read

Nikon D5300 vs D7100 : Which Should You Buy?

·

Nikon’s D5300, the latest update to their already class-leading entry/mid-level SLR, not only widens the gap between Nikon and their Canon competitors, it makes the choice to spend a little more money on the Nikon D7100 even harder. Below, I’ll briefly explain what has been added to (and what has been taken away from) the D5200 to derive the D5300, but I’ll primarily focus on the differences that remain between the D5300 and the D7100. Most entry and mid-level photographers will be perfectly happy with the D5300, but some types of photographers will need to consider the additional capabilities of the Nikon D7100.

NOTE: The D5300 has now been superseded by the almost identical D5500 (which lacks GPS, but adds a touch screen). Read the updated comparison of the D5500 vs D7100 here.

New In the D5300

If you’re deciding between this and the D5200, these are the things that are new in the D5300:

  • the Optical Low-Pass filter has been removed from the sensor for (potentially) sharper, higher resolution images
  • built-in Wi-Fi and GPS have been added
  • the processor has been upgraded to an Expeed 4
  • the top of the ISO scale has been increased by a stop, to 12800 / +25600
  • the ability to shoot 60 progressive frames per second at 1080p resolution
  • its a few milometers shorter and narrower, and about 50 grams lighter
  • the rear LCD is now a larger 3.2″ 1,037,000 pixel model

Nikon D5300 vs D7100: What’s the Difference?

To begin with, we can take a look at the most significant specs for the D5300 and the D7100.

Nikon D5300 Nikon D5200 Nikon D7100
Price (body)
 $597 $696 $797
Price (with 18-140mm kit lens) $897 $1096 $1097
Body Material Sereebo, (carbon fiber reenforced plastic) body-chassis Plastic (separate body and chassis) Partial Magnesium Alloy Frame, Plastic
Sensor Resolution 24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)		 24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)		 24.1 Megapixels
(Toshiba)
Anti-Aliasing Filter
(Reduces sharpness, prevents moire)		 NO YES NO
ISO Range 100-12800
+25600		 100-6400
+12800
+25600		 100-6400
+12800
+25600
Total AF Points 39 39 51
Cross-Type AF Points 9 9 15
AF Motor In Body
(For Using Older AF Lenses)		 NO NO YES
AF Light Level Range -1 to +19 EV -1 to +19 EV -2 to +19 EV
Autofocus Fine Tuning
Adjustments		 NO NO YES
Shutter Speed Range 1/4000th - 30 sec.
+bulb		 1/4000th - 30 sec.
+bulb		 1/8000th - 30 sec.
+bulb
Expected Shutter Life 100,000 Shots 100,000 Shots 150,000 Shots
Max Frame Rate 5 fps 5 fps 6 fps
(7 shots in 1.3x crop mode)
Max RAW Burst
(buffer size)		 6 shots, compressed 14-bit 8 shots, compressed 14-bit 7 shots lossless 12-bit
6 shots lossless 14-bit
Max JPG Burst
(fine, Large)		 100*

*this number is so much higher than that provided for the D5200 and D7100, it may be a mistake		 35 33
Flash Sync Speed 1/200th sec. 1/200th sec. 1/250th sec.
(1/320th* sec, or slower,)
Wireless Flash
(Built-in Commander)		 NO NO YES
Auto FP Flash Mode
(High Speed Sync)		 NO NO YES
Media Slots 1 SD / SDHC / SDXC 1 SD / SDHC / SDXC 2 SD / SDHC / SDXC
LCD Size 3.2"
1,036,800 pixels		 3.0"
921,000 pixels		 3.2"
1,228,800 pixels
LCD Articulated Yes Yes No
Body Weight 480g (no battery)
530g (with battery)		 505g (no battery)
555 g (with battery)		 675 (no battery)
Battery Life not provided 500 shots
CIPA Standards		 950 shots
CIPA Standards
Viewfinder Coverage 95% Frame
.82x Magnification		 95% Frame
.78x Magnification		 100% Frame
.94x Magnification
Video Codec MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov		 MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov		 MPEG-4 / H.264
.mov
Video Resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50i, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)		 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)		 1920 x 1080 (60i*, 50i*, 30, 25, 24 fps)
1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps)
640 x 424 (30, 25 fps)

*only in 1.3x crop mode
Video Length Limit 29 min 59 sec. 29 min 59 sec. 29 min 59 sec.
Headphone Jack No No Yes
Internal Mic Stereo Stereo Stereo

Build Quality

Perhaps the most obvious difference between the D7100 and the D5300 is in their construction. The D5300 body is significantly smaller and lighter, with a body made entirely of polycarbonate, while the D7100 is heavier and built for durability, with a metal (magnesium alloy) back and top. Since the D5300 also uses a smaller battery, the carry-around weight of the D7100 is about 30% more than the D5300.

Whether this is an advantage or disadvantage depends on your photographic needs; some photographers (especially those with larger hands) prefer a larger camera with some ‘heft’ to it, while others prefer something more lightweight and easy to carry around, especially travelers and hikers. Needless to say, those who work in harsh conditions will also prefer the D7100’s weather sealing and heavier-duty construction, as a matter of practicality.

The Sensors : Exactly the Same

The success of the D800e may have led directly to Nikon’s decision to produce an APS-C camera without an optical low-pass/anti-aliasing (OLP/AA) filter, but whatever led to the fact, the D7100’s sensor is naked. Before the D800e, all of the major SLRs produced their sensors with an AA filter: essentially an extra layer in front of the sensor that blurs the image slightly, in order to reduce the jagged edges and moire 1 The Wikipedia article on moire patterns is very helpful, if you’re unfamiliar with the term. that have traditionally been associated with digital capture. With modern improvements in image processing software, though, Nikon was confident that the moire and jaggies could be avoided without the AA filter, so they opted to remove it and allow the cameras to capture finer image detail.

Now, with the success of the D7100, Nikon has also decided to remove the AA filter from the D5300’s sensor. Though this does provide the potential to for the camera to produce sharper images, don’t expect too much.

Comparisons of images produced by the D800 (AA Filter) and D800e (no AA Filter) have shown that the principle works; there are subtle improvements in fine detail in the D800e’s images. However, we should not expect such significant improvements in the D7100’s images. The receptors on the 24 megapixel sensor of the D7100 are already much, much smaller than those of the D800e. In fact, the D7100 and D5300 fit about 56% more pixels into the same sensor area than the D800e2 Further details and measurements can be found on DigicamDB. .

Why does that matter? Even with the much larger receptors of the D800, lens resolution has become a serious bottle-neck for image quality3 See this DxO Mark article for further details. . The dramatically higher pixel density of Nikon’s 24 megapixel sensors will tax lens resolution even more, meaning that the D7100’s images won’t get much sharper unless lenses get sharper first.

So, using the best quality lenses at their optimal aperture settings, photographers using a properly stabilized camera might see slight improvements in the sharpness in the center of their images, and in the best circumstances, also towards the corners. For most snapshots, though, there would be no difference between this and the D5200’s sensor.

Auto Focus Systems

Unlike most entry and mid-level SLRs, the Nikon D5300 has a very sophisticated autofocus system. While cameras like the Canon T4i and 60D have 9 autofocus points, the D5300 has 39, though only 9 of them are cross-type 4 If you don’t know why cross-type points are so important, I recommend watching the first half of our Photography Notes video . As you can see from the chart above, this autofocus system, which also incorporates color information, has been adopted from the Nikon D7000.

The D7100, however, shares the same AF system with the flagship Nikon D4 and the D800: 51 AF points, including 15 cross-type… the best system available in a Nikon body.

For all but the most dedicated action photographers, the system in the D5300 (and D7000) will be more than sufficient, even if you’re buying a camera primarily for shooting sports. If your paycheck, however, is going to depend on your focusing system, the extra several hundred dollars will be well spent on the D7100.

Nikon D5300 and D7100, backs

Speed

When it comes to speed, the differences between the D5300 and D7100 are more modest that you might expect. The D7100 does have a top shutter speed that is one full f-stop faster than the D5300’s (ie, 1/8000th vs 1/4000th). When it comes to shooting bursts of photos, though, the D7100 only provides an additional frame per second over the D5300’s 5 fps (unless you’re shooting in 1.3x crop mode, in which case it will give up an additional frame per second).

More importantly, though, the under-sized buffer in the D7100 does not allow longer bursts than the D5300; in fact, the D5300 comes out dead even. The D7100 and D5300 can both only shoot 6 14-bit RAW shots before the buffer is full (the D5200 could manage 8). Compare this to the 15 RAW shots allowed by a Canon 60D or 25 in a 7D5 with the most recent firmware upgrade. Originally, the 7D also shot about 15 RAW frames before filling the buffer , and it will be clear that neither Nikon is probably ideal for photographers who rely on the machine-gun method of action photography.

That said, shooting JPG changes things dramatically. The D7100 can shoot bursts of at least 33 frames (at 6 fps) while the D5300 may be able to shoot 100 or more frames (at 5fps).

Nikon D7100 and D5300, overhead view

The D5300’s Downfall

Flash. With the popularity of “Strobist” techniques over the past several years, flash photography has become increasingly important to amateur and semi-pro photographers, and this is where the D5300 falls short: it lacks high-speed-sync (Auto FP Flash, henceforth AFP) and external flash control with the built-in flash. External flash control may not be a big deal; many of us prefer to use radio-units instead… though the built-in IR system can be very useful with Nikon’s Creative Lighting System (CLS).

The lack of AFP, however, is a serious problem. Consider this situation: you’re shooting a portrait outdoors during the day, and you want to use a large aperture to blur the background… perhaps f/2 or f/1.4 . This will push your shutter speed beyond 1/1000ths of a second, much higher than the camera’s 1/200th sec. maximum sync speed. So, if you want to use a flash to soften the shadows or create a catch-light in the eyes of your subject, forget it: the flash will not sync. The same is true if you want to use flash for sports and a high shutter speed, and while you can purchase external command modules or radio transmitters for off-camera-flashes, there’s nothing you can buy to work around the lack of AFP. You’d need to buy the D7100 instead.

All the Little Things

There are a few other assorted differences that deserve mention here, but they’re mostly the same differences that we saw between the D5100 and D7000. First, the D5300 does not have an autofocus motor built into the camera body, so it will not be compatible with the full range of (old school) Nikon lenses, while the D7100 does posses the motor. And speaking of “focus”, the D7100 is capable of micro adjustments to correct for front or back-focus problems on lenses, while the D5300 is not.

As should be obvious from the images above, the D5300 has an articulated LCD screen, which some people find helpful for ground-level shots and video but others find a breakage hazard or amateurish.

Finally, if you are interested in video, the D7100 has been given a headphone jack for monitoring audio while you shoot. The jack is absent in the D5300 (and D7000).

Which to Buy?

The Nikon D5300 is a great camera, and I’d recommend it for the vast majority of amateur photographers with the exception of those who need superior flash capabilities.

To summarize, you should buy the D5300 if you:

  • want a great, all-around camera
  • shoot primarily with natural light or studio strobes
  • have smaller hands, or need the lightest body while maintaining high performance
  • need an articulated LCD screen for video or photos
  • want to shoot video at 1080/60p

Buy the D7100 if you:

  • are hard on your equipment and need a more durable body
  • use flash for action or fill and need high-speed sync
  • use Nikon’s CLS and want to use the built-in command module
  • shoot macro (or other focus critical work) and need to make micro adjustments to your lenses
  • shoot a lot of video and want a simple headphone jack on your camera

For the sake of simplicity I’ve tried to focus on only the differences that, in my experience, will actually be important. There are, of course, numerous differences between the two cameras, though, and some features may be more important to particular photographers.
If you think that I’ve left out something important, please feel free to let me know.

Please Comment!

If you have additional questions or comments, please let me know, below. I’ll do what I can to answer questions and clear up any confusion.

Tags
Matthew Gore
Editor-in-Chief
Matthew Gore is the Editor-in-Chief and Administrator of Light & Matter Media.
Related

387 Comments

  1. Very useful review. :)

    I am an amateur, and so was looking at the D3300, D5300 and D5500 !!! I short-listed this further to D5300 or D5500. I would really like to have the flexibility of the touch screen, but looking from a price perspective, looks like I will stick to the D5300. My confusion currently is regarding the lenses. The options that I see are :

    1) Buy body + kit lense (18-55mm VR II) + a Prime (AF-S Nikkor 50mm F/1.8G)
    2) Buy body + kit lense (18-55mm VR II) + a Prime (AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G)
    3) Buy body + kit lense (AF-S DX 18-55mm VR II & AF-S DX 55-200mm VR II)
    4) Buy body + a Prime (35 or 50 ?) + Tamron AF 18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD IF

    Which do you think is the best option ?

    Reply

    1. Hi Nubin,
      I’d start by throwing out choice #4. There’s no such thing as a good 18-200 lens (at least, not yet).

      You might consider the Nikon 18-140mm lens instead, though. It’s quite good.

      Otherwise, the lenses you choose are a matter of personal preference and completely dependent on what you plan to do with your camera. Personally, I have little use for a 35mm prime lens, but some people love them. I use a 50mm a bit more, and they’re great in low light, but if you’re not shooting events in low light situations, that’s not a concern. The 50mm does make a pretty decent portrait lens, and it’s good to have a prime for those times when you really need a shallow depth of field… if that sort of thing interests you.

      For me, I’d narrow it down to choice 1 or 3. Go with one if you want the prime for the reasons mentioned above, or #3 is you need the telephoto reach for travel, outdoor sports, or wildlife, etc.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  2. Which one would you buy for long video recordings? d7200 vs d5500
    Is there any cheap alternative DSLR around 20 mp any brand or even 18 mp has pro video recording?

    Reply

    1. Hello Syed,

      It depends on what you have in mind when you say “pro video”. Virtually any Canon DSLR (back to the the T2i) can be used for pro video production when you add the free firmware side-car, Magic Lantern. That is, the video quality is high enough, and the audio is too if you’re not recording it separately.

      However, none of the Canon SLRs (except that 7D II and 70D) and none of the Nikon SLRs have professional-quality autofocus. Most professional film makers don’t mind because they use manual focus (rather than risk the camera losing focus or hunting for focus during the middle of shooting scene).

      If you want to use autofocus the same way that you would on a consumer video camera, though, there aren’t many options. You can use the Canon 70D or 7D II, or you can use a mirrorless camera like the micro-4/3rds Panasonics or Sony a7 series (or perhaps even the less expensive a6000; it’s also APS-C, full-HD).

      That said, I do not shoot much video myself, so I am probably not the best person to answer your question.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  3. Great article!! I have a couple specific questions. I am looking to start a videography business and already have interest in various areas of video (marketing videos, music videos, sports highlight films, and even weddings). I have experience with DSLR cameras in my undergrad career, and currently do not have the funds to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars on a professional video camcorder.

    I do have the funds for the D7100 if it is the best option, but I would have to budget accessory costs a bit (three point lighting, backdrops, mics, etc.).

    My questions are if a DSLR camera would even work for the wide array of VIDEO opportunities or should I just wait until I can afford the camcorder (if ever), and if so, is the D7100 worth the extra few hundred dollars in comparison to the D5300 in terms of video and sound quality.

    Any feedback would be greatly appreciated, and again great article! Thank you in advance

    Reply

    1. Hi Gregg,

      It really depends on how you intend to shoot video. If you intend to shoot video with autofocus, Canon’s system is miles ahead of Nikon’s. In fact, the Canon 70D and 7D Mark II are really the only SLRs that I’d trust with serious video work, with autofocus. If you are happy to manual focus, then your options are much wider.

      Canon also has some great additional features that are available by using the Magic Lantern firmware side-car. http://www.magiclantern.fm/index.html It’s worth checking out.

      I can’t give you a whole lot of detail, since I don’t shoot much video.

      Reply

    1. Bird photography can either be easy or hard on a camera, depending on your style. When I lived in Florida, I photographed quite a few wading birds, and that was no trouble for any of my cameras… they moved slowly in the water. The only time I needed speed was when I was shooting the herons or egrets striking at their prey, and 5 frames per second was fast enough for me to get plenty of good shots.

      However, I have also tried shooting birds in flight, and that’s a bit harder. A good autofocus system is more important. For that type of photography, I’d recommend the D7100 rather than the D5300/D5500. Either way, with enough patience and practice, you’ll get what you want.

      If you don’t care about birds in flight, then go with the D5500 and save your extra money for a 400mm lens. :-)

      – Matthew

      Reply

  5. Hi there,
    I like to shoot fast sports like cycling,skiing as well as nature and scenery. I was wondering if the D5300 would be the best camera for me, I have a fairly low budget of around £500($780) excuding lenses.
    Thank you!

    Reply

    1. Hi Henry,

      For fast sports, the D7100 or D7200 would be slightly better, but the D5300 or D5500 would certainly be good enough, for the vast majority of the time. That is, it’s a better camera than many professionals were shooting with 5 or 10 years ago, and they were able to take plenty of great photos.

      The D7200 will give you slightly better frame rate, and quite a bit better burst durations if you’re shooting RAW files. If you are satisfied with shooting JPG, that won’t be a concern.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  7. Nice comparisons and great article!! So, I just bought a D5500 to shoot video for my daughter’s high school band competitions. I have also borrowed a D7000 for actions shots throughout the 9 minute performance and various shots while they are warming up and moving about. I like the performance of the D7000 and I am thinking about getting one. So the search is on and I keep seeing that the D7100 replaced the D7000 and that the D5300 is very close in performance and features to the 7100. I like to rapid shoot the entire performance as to see the step-by-step movement of each group. It looks as though it’s kind of a toss up between the 7100 and the 5300. Money really isn’t a concern because the two are so close in cost as of today. I’m 6′ 2″ and 200 lbs, so weight of the camera isn’t a huge concern either. I am just looking for your opinion on if getting a D5300 is silly seeing as how I have the D5500 already. Any advantage by getting the 7100? 51 points vs 39 make a huge difference?

    Reply

    1. Hi Scott,
      I’m not sure that there’d be much of an advantage of getting a D7100… but there probably would be if you got a D7200. It has a bigger buffer, so if you’re shooting lots of shots in succession, the buffer won’t get bogged down and stop your shooting so frequently. You may not run into that if you shoot JPG, but it’s a big issue if you shoot RAW (and you should). If you haven’t seen it already, I’ve written an article on the subject :)
      – Matthew

      Reply

  8. Would either of these cameras suffice in a low light, for instance shooting bands in bars, environment? or should I be looking exclusively at full frame cameras?

    Reply

    1. Hi Hugh,
      They will both suffice, as long as you use the right lenses and know what you’re doing… but a full-frame camera is really ideal for low light, and the D610 body is only about $200 more than a D7200, although it is significantly more than the D7100.

      The important thing, when shooting in low-light stage situations will be to meter correctly for the highlights to keep them from blowing out… and not trying to get the entire frame to be exposed as if it were daylight. That will keep your ISO down in a reasonable range and will also take advantage of the interesting lighting possibilities that you get in dark situations.

      And of course, you’ll need to be using large aperture lenses, since they let in so much more light. As you probably know, and f/1.4 lens will let in 16 times more light (4 stops) than an f/5.6 lens like the kit lenses, and that’s a really significant difference… that’s the difference between shooting at ISO 400 and ISO 6400. Nikon makes some nice, inexpensive large aperture lenses: the 50mm f/1.8, the 85mm f/1.8, and the 35mm f/1.8, for example, and if you have a bigger budget, the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 ART series lens is amazing.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  9. Matthew,

    I’m very much interested in wildlife and nature photography. Both cameras are available for same price range with 18-140mm.
    1) What should I buy?
    2) Considering 18-140mm and 55-300mm what is the best for wildlife photography?

    Reply

  10. SO, I’m trying to decide between the d5300 and d7100. Everything you mention puts me in the d5300 category EXCEPT for more sturdy body on the d7100 and greater lens compatibility. After doing a bunch of research, I can’t determine if my old AI fisheye and my AF G zoom will work on the 5300. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for the great article.

    Reply

    1. Hello George,

      If you tell me more about your fisheye, I can be more definitive, but it should be compatible, but without autofocus. Most “G” series lenses will be fully compatible, including autofocus, but again, I’d need to know the specific lens.

      Matthew

      Reply

  11. Hello I really enjoyed reading this article.

    I have a question, I have a D5100 and want to upgrade? I use my camera mostly for my kids sporting events mainly basketball. I want better action pictures. Please help thank you!

    Reply

  12. Olá Matthew Gore! Sou do Brasil! Gostei muito das suas dicas! Parabéns!
    Porém, gostaria de pedir sua ajuda. Eu estou indeciso entre a D5300 e a d7100
    Eu estou começando a aprender fotografia. E desejo ser um profissional.
    Poderia me explicar uma coisa? Como a D7100 produz uma imagem com melhor qualidade (nitidez) que a D5300, sendo que as duas possuem o mesmo sensor?

    Google Tradutor:

    Hello Matthew Gore! I’m from Brazil! Greatly appreciated your tips! Congratulations!
    However, I would ask your help. I’m torn between the D5300 and the D7100
    I’m starting to learn photography. And I want to be a professional.
    Could you explain me something? As D7100 produces an image with better quality (sharpness) that the D5300, and the two have the same sensor?

    Reply

  13. I like to shoot nature and people, and sometimes indoor and I am confused between the D7100 and d5300 so Which one is best for me after having nikon coolpix p520?

    Reply

  14. Just 1 Question
    Which cam is best for weddings , outdoors , fasion photography , studios. ?
    D5300 or D7100.

    Reply

  15. I’m looking to purchase a lens for my d5300 and I came across the Nikon 17-55 2.8, tamron 17-50 2.8, and the sigma 17-50 2.8. The Nikon lens I found online for $600, which I believe is a good deal but if I can get the same type of photo with a 3rd party lens I would prefer to go with a tamron or sigma. Tamron lens I found for $300, and the sigma for around $300-$400. Could you please give me your opinion on the lenses and which one would be best for me. I would like it to be my walk around lens for shooting portraits, sports, and my dogs.

    Reply

    1. Hi Ed,
      I hope you also saw my reply to your first comment here.

      I have not used the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8, but I’ve heard that’s it’s a good quality lens. However, I do own a Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, which I love. The autofocus is fast enough for any of the work I’ve done with it (events, weddings, wildlife) and the image quality is wonderful, especially if it’s stopped down to f/5.6 (for shooting landscapes from a tripod.

      The zoom range of this lens is pretty short for shooting sports, but it will work when the action is close.
      -Matthew

      Reply

      1. Yes I did, thank you.
        Someone is selling a sigma 17-50mm 2.8 and a sigma 70-200mm 2.8 for $1000. Do you think that is a good deal for both? I have a Nikon 55-200 4-5.6 but I want to get a 2.8 instead. I’ve iust never purchased a 2.8 lens before and I want to stay within my budget.
        Thank you so much for your help, it is greatly appreciated.

        Reply

        1. Yes, that sounds like a pretty good deal, although it depends on which version of the 70-200 it is. If it’s an OS model, that helps. If it’s not an OS model, then it’s a pretty average price for those lenses. Regardless, it will perform a lot better than the Nikon 55-200, especially for portraits and sports. You may find that when you have the light to work with, you’ll want to stop it down to f/4 to get a little extra sharpness and contrast.

          Reply

  16. Hello,
    I recently purchased the Nikon D5300, it came with a kit lens (18-55 VR), 50mm 1.8, and 55-200mm 4-5.6. I’m considering selling the kit lens and the 50mm so I can purchase the Nikon 17-55mm 2.8. Do you think that is a good move? I just want a good all around lens for sports photography and taking pictures of my dogs. I also want to get the sb-600, is that a good flash or should I be looking at something else?

    Reply

    1. Hi Ed,

      The Sb-600 was a great flash… so if you can find one, good. Otherwise, the SB-700 (its replacement) is just as good. There are cheaper Chinese options available that are also good, but they’re not going to be as solid and reliable as the Nikon.

      As for the lenses, I’d keep the 50mm f/1.8. It’s an excellent lens for low-light or for portraits; every photographer should have a large aperture prime lens like this in their kit… it will come in handy for all kinds of things once you start using it and see what it can do. The shallow depth of field is very nice.

      Selling the kit 18-55 seems like a good idea, and the Nikon 17-55 f/2.8 is a great choice for low light and for sports. However, if it were up to me, I’d opt for an f/2.8 lens at the telephoto end of the zoom instead… unless you’re usually shooting indoor sports like basketball where you can get close to the action all the time. For baseball, football, soccer, track, and other outdoor sports, a large aperture telephoto like a 70-200 f/2.8 will be much more useful. The Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC USD is just as sharp as the Nikkor, and it’s a lot less expensive, so it’s a good option…. but lens choice is always a matter of personal taste. Get what you think you’ll use.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  17. i have always been so much passionate about photography but was not able to afford such stuff then i collected money for a long time then i got something so that i could afford nikon d7100 and i am looking forward to buy it soon. bt when i read the specs of d5300 i found ther was not a hell of a difference in specs but a big difference in price. so i am confused for what to go for. actually i love the feel of gripping d7100 and the lcd on top it just feels pro. but stil why a big difference in price while no big deal in specs??

    Reply

    1. Hello Talha,

      Yes, I agree, it would be very hard to pay so much more for the D7100. It is a better camera, but the differences are pretty minimal… you’re really paying a lot for a heavier metal body.

      At this point, you might want to consider going for the D7200 instead. It has significantly better performance for shooting action, at least. Otherwise, you’ll just have to decide whether it’s worth it to you to spend the money to get the body style and feel that you want. Performance aside, it’s important to be able to pick up your camera and feel comfortable with it, and not be wishing that you had something else.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  18. congrats awesome article. i need some help. i read that you said d5300 does not have AF micro-adjustment, which could be an issue with some lenses.
    i found focus problems on combo d5300 + 35mm 1.8 if i had d7100 i would have the same problem with 35mm 1.8? or i have resolved it with micro-adjustment of d7100?

    Reply

    1. If the problem you’re experiencing is consistent front focusing or consistent back focusing, then it is likely that the AF adjustment of the D7100 or D7200 would be able to fix it. However, if you’re just experiencing unreliable focus (which is common with large aperture primes), then that’s not something you’ll be able to fix with micro-AF adjustment. It’s also worth keeping in mind that some lenses have more serious AF problems (de-focus when the aperture stops down, or focus consistently at mid-range but not up close, etc) and these are things that can only be fixed by a professional, if at all. That’s much more rare, though.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  19. Hello. For a new in the photography world, which camera should i buy: the new nikon d5500 with 18-140mm or the old D7100 with 18-140mm, both are the same price.

    Reply

    1. If it were my choice, I’d go for the D7100 every time. It’s a more robust camera with a better viewfinder and better AF system, better flash functionality, and those things are important to me. However, if you want a lighter, more compact camera, or want the touch-screen, then the D5500 is also a great camera… you just have to decide which characteristics are more important to you.

      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Thanks Matthew, Touch screen and wi-fi are nice features but not a really deal breaker. D7100 is my choice.
        Thank you very much

        Reply

  20. Hi Matthew. My interest is taking pictures of the night sky. Which camera and lens do you recommend me?

    Reply

    1. As for the camera body, there isn’t much to recommend one over the other. They both have good high-ISO performance. I’d probably go with the D5500 because it’s less expensive.

      As for the lens, you’ll probably want something that has a large aperture and that is on the wide-angle side… assuming you want to capture large portions of the sky and Milky Way at once. A 24mm, 28mm, or 35mm would probably be a good choice, but with a smaller sensor camera, you’ll have to find something that will give you those equivalent fields of view. The Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 is an excellent lens and covers part of that range, so it’s a good option.

      However, you should be fine shooting with an f/2.8 or even f/3.5, so any wide angle zoom should be workable. There aren’t a lot of options for wide primes.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  21. Hi Matthew,

    I like your comparison that includes some practical aspects (like build-in autofocus motor) but not just test chart comparisons. May I add one really important thing you missed in the comparison? Its the pathetic optical viewfinder of the 5000 series (tiny size and not full coverage) compared to the 7000 series (OK size and 100% coverage). Since for any (D)SLR the viewfinder is the main interface (especially for moving subjects like insects where you need fast autofocus and fast shutter response), this was the main reason I switched from D5100 to the D7100 and its a whole universe of a difference. I do miss the swivel screen of the D5100 for ground shots, though.
    Best,
    Steve

    Reply

  22. I am very new to photography and am enjoying capturing my kids playing various sports. Which camera would be better for both indoor and outdoor . . . mainly basketball, softball and indoor dance competitions?

    Reply

    1. Hi Kathy,

      Ultimately, the D7100 (or the new D7200) is going to be the answer any time you ask which is better :) However, the D5300/D5500 will also do the job just fine for most things. When I started shooting digital, professionally, even pro-level digital cameras had fewer AF points than the D5500, and we all did just fine. The important part is getting familiar with the camera and practicing, and realizing that the camera is just a tool and will never do the whole job for you… it’s the photographer that makes the biggest difference.

      My general advice is to buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs and then buy the best lenses you can afford. Anything indoor is going to be hard without great lenses… the lenses you use will make a much bigger difference than the camera… you’ll want to use wide aperture lenses (such as f/1.4, f/1.8, f/2.8), that let in lots of light.

      So, unless you think that you’ll need the ability to shoot more RAW shots in a row (then buy the D7200), I’d go for the D5300 or D5500 and some nice lenses.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  23. Hello mathew,
    i’m begining to start with my fashion photography ,so thinking of buying a new dslr ,i was looking into nikon d5300 , but after reading several reviews i found that the auto focus is very bad in d5300 and the image quality is not that great as in d7100 .Please let me know which one do you sugguest for fashion photography to take awesome pics , i don’t want to disappoint my models with there pic quality expectations .

    Please reply .

    Thank you

    Reply

    1. Hi Peter,

      The autofocus in the D5300 is not “very bad”. The AF system has been used by countless professionals in the D7000 for weddings and events, even some sports. I wouldn’t want it if I were going to be a professional sports photographer; I might even have some reservations if I were shooting wildlife professionally… but in a studio, or even on a runway, the D5300 should be more than sufficient. The camera does not have AF micro-adjustment, which could be an issue with some lenses, but that’s not very common.

      The most important thing is to get familiar with your AF system, choose the best settings (ie, choose to use only a single AF point so that you can focus on the near eye rather than letting the camera choose one), and practice.

      That said, for fashion photography, some of the flash features of the D7100/d7200 might be useful; high-speed sync will very likely be useful in some of your outdoor shoots. So, you’re probably leaning in the right direction.
      -Matthew

      Reply

  24. Hi Matthew, I really enjoyed reading your comparison of these two bodies! I’m stuck between the two, and can’t decide which would be best for me. My primary focus is on nature and wildlife photography (landscape/macro/night/you name it). The weather seal of the 7100 is very appealing to me, but my lenses are not weather sealed and I’m not sure that alone will be worth the price jump. However, I am very interested in someday getting into super-macro insect photography. Would the 7100 be better suited for that sort of thing than the 5300?

    The one thing that appeals to me most about the 5300 is the size and weight. I have small hands and I always carry my camera with me while hiking. Having something lighter to carry around would be a big plus especially if I’m already trekking along with a tripod.

    I want to be able to take the best images possible, and the 7100 is something within my budget.

    Which would you recommend?

    Reply

    1. Hi Mindi,

      For me, the question would be this: what is it about the D7100 that you think you might need? It sounds like the weather sealing is not a very compelling reason for you.

      Other than that, and considering the type of photography that interests you, the D5300 (or the new D5500, but probably the D5300) sounds perfect for you. You get the same image quality that you’d get with the D7100 (assuming that you shoot RAW to get the best image quality) and it’s nice and light. The new D7200 will give you a better buffer size if you want to shoot lots of action shots in a row… which is sometimes helpful if you’re doing wildlife… but the D7100 really isn’t any better off than the D5300.

      My general advice is always this: buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs, and buy the best lenses that you can afford. Good lenses will make all the difference in your images, and they’ll last longer than a body. So, I’d save money on the body… buy a D5300 (cheaper, now that the D5500 is out, but I don’t like that they removed the GPS from it, and I don’t need a touch screen on a camera) and use the money that you saved to buy the best lenses that you can.

      – Matt

      Reply

  25. Wow! I was just surfing the Internet and looking information about the cameras d5300, d5500, d7100 and d7200 – which should I buy and then I bumped into this article. I have to admit that I’m amazed with your responses to people’s comments. You are really not only willing to help but also helpful! I really admire your attitude. That’s all. :-)

    Greetings from Poland!

    Reply

  26. Thanks for your nice review Matthew. I have D5300 and 4 lenses: 18-55 VR, 35 1.8, 18-105 VR and 55-200 VR.
    1) which one you recommend most for portrait and infant photos?
    2) what is the drawbacks of the 35 1.8 in this regard?
    3) Is the AFP issue of flash is available in the D7000?
    4) Is the 18-140 far better than 18-105 (apart from the zoom reach) that you recommend I try to replace it?
    thanks in advance

    Reply

    1. 1) In general, for portraits, I like to use a short telephoto lens or “normal” lens… between about 85mm and 150mm. The advantage is that the perspective of these lenses doesn’t create the unflattering distortion that wider lenses do, and they help create nice, smooth out-of-focus background separation. So, I’d shoot with either the 18-105 at the telephoto end, or the 55-200. But, that’s a matter of personal preference. For infants, the 35mm might work nicely, since babies generally don’t mind if it makes them look a little fat.

      2) There are two problems with using a wide angle lens for shooting portraits. First, to fill the frame, you have to be very close to your subject. For adults, that can be uncomfortable… but for babies, maybe not such a big deal. Wide angle lenses do not provide such smooth bokeh (out of focus backgrounds) as longer lenses, so it can be easier to get a smooth, clean background with a longer lens. There’s also the matter of distortion. With a wide angle lens, parts of the subject that are closer to the camera seem disproportionately large. With most 35mm lenses that’s not a big problem, but the effect is there.

      3)The D7000, D7100, and D7200 are all capable of high-speed-sync (AFP).

      4) I’m just not sure. The 18-140 is going to have better resolution, especially in the center of the image, but it’s not dramatically better. You’d probably be able to notice it in side by side tests, but I doubt anyone would be able to guess which lens was used to shoot a photo, otherwise. If I were going to replace the 18-105, I’m not sure that the 18-140 would be my first choice… there are lots of great lenses out there.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  27. Hi Matthew,

    There’s a bundle going on between the Nikon D5300 and D7100, both are going for $1,299.95. Difference is the D5300 comes with 18-140mm VR lens kit while the D7100 comes with 18-140mm lens. Is there much difference with it being a VR lens? I will say I’m new at photography but want to build my skills with scenery and portraits…which would be a better buy for a newbie? Thank you.

    Reply

  28. Hi Matthew,

    I had Sony Alpa 230. I am planning to replace it with Nikon D5300 or D7000 with AF-S DX Nikkor 18-140mm 1:3.5-5.6 G ED VR lens.

    Photography is my hobby. I will use it mostly indoor to shoot my little kids and Parties and occasionally outdoors for weddings. Can you please suggest me which one I need to buy either D5300 or D7000 and which lenses are best for these models.

    — Manmohan

    Reply

  29. Hi Matthew,

    Great article and very informative! I just had a couple questions. Which camera would benefit me the most for portrait photography/scenery. Lens wise and camera body.

    Reply

    1. For the camera, I’d go with the Nikon D5300, unless you can come up with a convincing reason that you need some feature that only the D7100 has :-) My general advice is always this: buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs, and the best lenses you can afford. So… if you’re still figuring out which lenses are going to be the best for your shooting style, you might start with the 18-140 zoom; it’s a great lens and will cover a large number of shooting situations. Lens choice is really the hardest things to decide… and it’s mostly a matter of personal taste and style. For portraits, many people like large aperture primes like the Nikon 85mm f/1.8G, or the f/1.4 version.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  31. Hello, I am looking for a bit of advice. I started my photography business last year after years of it being my hobby. I chose to start with the d5100 and a few choice lenses. I have a prime- 50mm F1.8, 35mm F1.8, and 50mm F1.2(my baby but its manual focus with my camera and sometimes its really hard to use and I just can’t use it with busy kids, lol) Also, on that note, my baby pulled the lens bag onto the ground and broke the front glass of that lens… screaming in my head… ahhh… Any recomendations on where to fix it or can it even be fixed? how much do you think?
    Anyways, am I right to believe that this lens will be autofocus on the d7100 bc it has the motor in itself?

    I am looking to upgrade my camera and I am almost sold on the d7100. not for any other reason other than the reviews and the upgraded features it has(not that I know they will be of use). Now let me tell you what I want the camera for and maybe you can help me decide… haha… well, please?

    I mainly photograph children and families, outside. I also have a studio though for infants. I love working with natural light, but I do own an external flash and many other lights and soft boxes for the studio. I plan to use this camera for all of that AND weddings. I have recently broken into, well I have succesfully done 3 last year and am booked for 3 more, so far, this year. I need something sharp, quick, and clear. I also do videos, so this is a big part of the option. After your post I am leaning more toward the d5300. What do you think?

    I am going to also purchase a nice zoom lens because one wedding is in a church where I am not allowed to get too close. I am looking at the Nikon 70-200 mm f3.5. Do you think I should get the Sigma 70-200mm for half the price and pretty much the same ratings?

    I primarily shoot with my 35mm f1.8 for convenience, it does give beautiful image quality.

    One more question? I have been having a problem with my d5100 where it is giving me an error on my shutter speed. I read that I have to take it in or do it myself, but the back comes off and the wheel that controls the shutter speed has dust or debris(sand) in it. Very possible, I do most of my sessions on the beach. Any suggestions or relatable stories? I Have also been experiencing an issue with it focusing on other items and not the child. I’m thinking it will have something to do with the error I have been getting, but it did just start, way after the error first appeared.
    Do you know how to reset the focusing mechanism? is that even possible? haha

    Reply

    1. Hi Britany,
      I’m actually not familiar with an autofocus Nikon 50mm f/1.2; there’s an older manual focus lens, but unfortunately, a manual focus lens will not become autofocus, even on a camera with a built-in AF motor. There are local camera and lens repair shops in most major cities, but for serious repairs (like a broken front element), they’ll usually ship the equipment back to Nikon for the repair. You should check with Nikon’s repair department for their procedure, and check whether it’s something that can be repaired. I’d be surprised if it’s less than $500… sorry!

      As a professional photographer, your needs are going to be different than other casual photographers who have the luxury of time and multiple chances to get their images right. For you, I’d recommend getting the D7100 rather than the D5300 or new D5500. You shoot with large aperture prime lenses, and you shoot outdoors. Whether or not you do it now, you’ll soon want to make use of the benefits of shooting with mixed flash and natural light outdoors, while using large apertures to keep your backgrounds nice and soft. Or you’ll want to shoot with fill flash during outdoor weddings. I can’t tell you the number of times that I’ve had to make use of high-speed-sync when shooting weddings or other events outdoors… especially for beach weddings. And the D5300/D5500 can’t do it.

      Luckily, the price on the D7100 is dropping significantly, so you won’t have to spend too much extra on it. Currently, you should be able to get it for about $996 for the body.

      As for the 70-200mm lens, I’d recommend the Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD; it is a bit more expensive than the Sigma, but the image quality is at least as good as the Nikon (if not better) and it doesn’t have the serious problems with focus breathing that the Nikon does. The Sigma is not terrible, but at f/2.8 it is pretty soft, especially at 200mm. The Tamron is tack sharp. I’d recommend taking a look at my video reviews of the Tamron lens (Canon version, but the Nikon is just as good). Here’s Part 1 and Part 2.

      As for the shutter speed error, I’m afraid I can’t help. It’s possible that your shutter module is going bad, or there may be a communication error somewhere in the camera. For camera cleaning/repair… unless you are very meticulous and patient, it’s really best handled by taking the camera in for service. The shutter issue, though, and focus problems are not related. On the D5100, there’s no way to reset the focus system (or change it at all). Again, sounds like something that a professional should look at.

      Good luck!
      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Thank you thank you thank so much. I really appreciate your words of advice. Sorry, I came back to look and my post wasn’t coming up so I posted it again. You can erase it. ha. D7100 it is and I will look into selling the 50mm f1.2… yes, it only shoots in manual, and it’s beautiful, but not so nice with a broken lens. boo.. I will look at the tamron.Thanks.

        Reply

  32. Hi Matthew
    I’m about to buy the Nikon D5300, 18-140, 35mm
    To be used for newborn photography and outdoor kids parties etc.. Do you think I have been getting the correct advice in your opinion and what would you recommend otherwise?
    Many thanks

    Reply

    1. Hi Jamie,
      The D5300 sounds like a great choice, and the 18-140mm lens is a very practical lens for all-around use. If you’re interested in doing newborn portraits, you might also consider a large aperture prime lens, like the Nikon 85mm f/1.8. It will give you a beautiful shallow depth of field for a more professional look on portraits, and it’s great in low light.
      Good luck!
      -Matthew

      Reply

  33. Hi Mattew.

    IM from Mexico.

    Wich is better for video? 5300 or d7100.
    I want to make videoblogs for youtube.

    But i dont thing the d7100 worth it for the price diference.

    Reply

    1. I’d go with the D5300. Actually, the D5300 is a little better for video (more frame rate options), but it does not have a headphone jack, if that would make any difference to you.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  34. Hi.
    I know that D7100 has more focus points but could D5300 be a viable option for shooting sports for less money? What about tracking and focus speed between the two?

    Reply

    1. Hi Mark,

      Well, you can look at it this way: the Nikon D7000 was a great camera for shooting sports (as was the Nikon D300/s). The D5300 has the same AF system as the older D7000, so there’s every reason to believe that it will perform just as well, and in my limited experience shooting action with it, it’s performed very nicely. It wouldn’t be my first choice, of course, for a professional sports shooter, but it will certainly do the job for just about anyone else.

      Keep in mind that lens choice makes up a significant part of AF performance when shooting action. You’ll want to use a lens that has a large maximum aperture and fast autofocus motor, definitely one of Nikon’s “Silent Wave” motors.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  35. Hey man thanks for the response. People make posts like these an never respond to the comments. Which makes it hard for someone like me who’s barley getting into this stuff. Just wanted to say thanks.

    Reply

  36. Looking for recommendations.
    About to purchase D5300 / 7100.
    Going to be used mainly for outdoor photography, night shots, landscape and wildlife.
    Using it in what might be classed as extreme conditions, cold weather, snow and ice

    Price is not a problem.
    Got little experience with digital photography, 20.000 pix with a Canon 1000d,
    But decided to treat myself.

    What do you suggest?

    Reply

    1. If reliability in harsh conditions is a factor, then you’ll definitely want the weather sealing and build quality of the D7100. You’ll need to keep in mind that many lenses are not weather sealed, so you should either make sure to buy sealed lenses, or give them extra protection.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  37. do you think when the d5500 drops they’ll drop the price on the d5300? want to get it since the d5500 doesn’t seem like much of an upgrade and would like to know if I should just wait.

    Reply

    1. Hi Mario,

      Yes, there’s a good chance that the D5300 prices will drop over the next several months. And I agree, this seems like a great time to buy the D5300, since the D5500 doens’t offer better performance, and in fact, loses GPS.
      – Matt

      Reply

  38. Hi Matthew,
    I have a d3200 and would like to upgrade to something that will give me better results for photographing wildlife (birds of Prey mostly) and I like the woodpeckers too. The 3200 only has 11 total auto focus points and I don’t know about the Cross-Type AF Points. It sounds like the D7100 would be a better choice for me with the 51 total auto focus points and the 15 Cross-Type AF Points. I would like to turn this now hobby in to a money making hobby to full time career.
    I guess my real question is should I sink any more money into the Nikon system or should I look at Canon?

    Reply

  39. Thank you Matthew for clarifying for me a bit.

    I have the D7000, but have fallen in love with my pocket camera’s built in GPS and the mapping possibilities. I did buy the external GPS unit for the D7000, but hated it! It took too long to start up and synch, it was a battery drain, and the cables were so finicky, that I ended up just throwing it out.

    I have bought the D5300 at Costco today, with the $300 rebate, and now am contemplating opening the box. My husband is discouraging me from “downgrading” from my D7000, so I went on line one more time to see if I can convince myself it’s the right move.

    I am nothing but a hobby photographer that travels a LOT, so I will really appreciate the reduction in total weight.

    Now, do I sell my D7000 body on Amazon, or do I become a Nikon “collector” and keep it…?

    Reply

    1. Hi Simona,

      I think you’ll be very happy with the D5300; it is capable of much better image quality than the D7000 (though that’s not a big deal… the D7000 was already really good), they have the same AF system, the D5300 is lighter, and of course, there’s the GPS… which will be missing from the D5500 when it starts shipping. If I were you, I’d sell your D7000 and spend the proceeds on lenses, memory, extra batteries, etc. To tell the truth, though, I still have all of my old cameras, dating back to 1994.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  40. hi Matthew, thanks for the quick response. can u help me choose which lens is best for group portrait/weddings? that is not a fixed focal lens. i have nikkor f/1.8g and when i used it for group portraits it only focuses at the center subject gives a clearer shot Yet the rest of the faces in the photo is softer.. i used portrait swtting in the d5300 camera. is 18-140mm lens would be good for landscape? street photography and portrAit? thanks in advance

    Reply

    1. Hey Reg,

      There are a few main things that determine show much of the image you’re taking is going to look sharp with a particular camera: the focal length of the lens, the aperture that you’re shooting at, and your distance from the subjects. Wide angle lenses are going to make it easier to keep more of the frame in focus, telephoto lenses harder (but it’s still possible). If you shoot at a small aperture (like f/8 – f/16) you’ll get more depth in focus too (as opposed to large apertures like f/1.8, f/2.8, etc, which are large). And if your subjects are farther away from you (more importantly, towards the far end of the focus range of the lens) the depth will be greater.

      With that in mind, you can get group shots with just about any lens… certainly with the 18-140. That lens is a good one for just about anything, though there are better lenses if you want to spend the money.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  41. hi matthew,
    i have been reading this thread and u have been extremely helpful to people in terms of which is which suits everyone needs. anyway i’d like to ask u about the difference between the optical viewfinder of nikon d5300 ‘pentamirror’ vs of ‘pentaprism’ of nikon d7100. is it a big deal to choose prism over mirror one? im thinking of buying d7100 because of that matter.. or u think that doesnt really matter a lot?? thanks in advance.

    Reply

    1. Hi Reg,

      I’m not sure whether it’s because of the design or the technology… I don’t know why mirrors should be much worse in theory… but the viewfinder of the D5300 is not as bright and large as that of the D7100. The difference isn’t huge, but it’s noticeable… and you’ve seen the numbers: the D7100 gives you 94% magnification, while the D5300 only gives you 82%. As I say, the 12% difference in size isn’t huge… and you’d never really notice a problem unless you compare them side to side, but you’d notice the difference if you started using one and then switched to the other.

      If you’re going to be shooting events in a dark setting pretty frequently, having the pentaprism might be nice. Otherwise, it’s not a huge deal.

      -Matt

      Reply

  42. Matthew, a really good article for someone who is definitely just an amateur, albeit a keen one. I currently have a D5000 with 18-55, 70-300 and 18-200 VR lenses and am thinking about upgrading the body. To me, the D5300 sounds like the right choice, as I’m definitely a keen amateur and not a heavy user. You mention the lack of autofocus motor in the D5300 – forgive my ignorance, but am I right in thinking that this won’t be a problem for the lenses I have?

    Two other questions: 1. what would be the next lens I should aim to get; and 2. Would you now wait for the D5500?

    Thanks

    David.

    Reply

    1. Hi David,

      You’re right; the lenses that you have now will work just as well (or better) on the D5300. No problems there.

      The D5300 is a great camera. So was the D5200… and unless you’re dying for a touch screen on your camera, or perhaps some improved video functionality, it’s hard to imagine that there’s any real benefit in waiting for a D5500. The D5300’s sensor can already out perform any lens that you put in front of it (when it comes to sharpness and resolution)… and it does pretty well at high ISO.

      The next lens for you is a hard choice and depends entirely on what you want to photograph. It looks like all of your lenses are variable max-aperture zooms, so a large aperture lens or two would really change your images. An 85mm f/1.8 would be great for portraits, for example, or a Tamron 70-200 f/2.8 VC USD would be a great all-around lens for sports, portraits, telephoto landscapes. But I’d really need to know more about what you shoot to make a suggestion.

      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Wow, that was quick!

        I’m not that worried about a touch screen although a more complete video capability – such as microphone socket – is certainly one reason for wanting to upgrade. So it depends a little on what new functional toys the D5500 might come with.

        My main interest is in portraits, mostly, but not always, close up studies. Would the 85 f1.8 still be your pick?

        Reply

        1. If you’re also interested in close-up/macro work, then the 60mm f/2.8 micro or 105mm f/2.8 micro are both nice portrait lenses that will also give you great close-up performance. Neither will give you quite the same shallow depth of field as an f/1.8 lens, though… everything is a trade off :)

          Reply

  43. Dear Sandy, Hope you had a great Thanksgiving Weekend. If I were you, I would go to your local Costco or other Nikon Retailer and would try both cameras hands on, I went to Costco and tried both the D5300 and the D7100 and I for my use, the D5300 is a better buy, for the following reasons:
    a) Image quality is better ( sharper and better colors )
    b) D7100 is aged, soon to be replaced by a new model, the D5300 has just been released only months ago.
    c) If you have regular size hands, the D5300 feels better and lighter, the D7100 is heavy and bulky.
    d) Wi-Fi is great, you can control the camera via your smart phone, great for remote shooting
    e) FLIP SCREEN on the D5300 ( fully articulated ) it is very usefull, I just did a photo shoot for advertising, and with a fixed sreen I would have had to kneel and bend to view the images, but with the D5300 I was simply standing and the screen did all the bending for me, the D7100 has a fixed screen.
    f) Expeed 4 processor and no OLPF Opticar Low Pass Filter, by removing this filter, Nikon has improved sharpness, colors and low light image quality.

    I would buy the D7100 camera, only if it was the latest model and if it had these features I mention above. The only advantages the D7100 has are the dual SD memory slots and the more accesible manual controls via dials and buttons, but since it is the aged model and does not have all the new features, I choose to buy the D5300 and in a couple of years, if Nikon upgrades the larger camera, then I would buy it and have both in my bag.

    Hope this makes your decision easier. I would spend the $300 price difference in buying the 35mm f1.8 lens or the 50mm f1.8g lens depending on my type of shooting. For portraits only the 50mm and for landscaping and portraits, the 35mm

    I currently own the Nikon D5300 with the 35mm f1.8 , the 18-140mm kit lens, the 70-300 VRII Nikkor Lens and the 50 mm f1.8g I got the SB700 flash as well.

    Good Luck and enjoy your new camera, whichever you choose to buy, will make you very happy.

    All the Best,

    Fernando

    Reply

    1. Hi AA,
      Sorry I can’t be of much help. Probably a good idea to head over to YouTube and do a general search.

      If I can make a couple of suggestions, though, they’d be these:

      Learn the difference between Aperture Priority and Shutter Priority, and use them. Ignore all of the other modes on that dial except for Manual.

      For help understanding when to use them, start by watching my video about the 3 Basics.

      Also figure out how to use Exposure Compensation. Learning the 3 basics + exposure compensation is really 90% of the important stuff.
      – Matthew

      Reply

  45. Hey Matthew,

    This was a hard choice for me as I already had the D5000 for 4 years and wanted to upgrade. Eventually I chose the D5300, because I mainly shoot while traveling and my main subject is landscapes and buildings, so speed and the controls are not the most important for me. I also shoot some videos which seems to be better on the D5300. The price difference was 800 euros for the D7100 and 600 euros for the D5300 with a 18-105mm kit lens. I also bought a Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 for landscape photography and a B+W 3.0 110 ND filter for long exposure. So that means I have the D5300, 35mm f/1.8, 11-16mm f/2.8 and 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6

    Do you think I made a good choice considering my needs and do you think there is anything else I would need? I don’t have a telezoom lens at the moment and I am thinking of that but then again I don’t need it so much so maybe the 18-105mm is enough for my needs.

    Thanks a lot!

    Reply

    1. Hi Daniel,

      It does sound like you made some good choices! The D5300 with the Tokina 11-16 sounds like a great combination for landscapes, and the 18-105 will cover most of your typical shooting situations.

      I should say, though, that my 70-200 f/2.8 is my favorite lens, and both the Nikon and the Tamron are excellent (but not the Sigma). I shoot with it most of the time, even when I’m doing landscapes. I like having the ability to isolate specific features, patterns and shapes from a larger landscape to create a tight composition with strong lines, and I think that a telephoto makes that easier. You should be able to do a good deal of that with your 105mm, but if you’re thinking about another lens, that’s the direction that I’d head.

      If that doesn’t fit your shooting style, though, don’t forget that it can be very handy to carry a macro lens for capturing fine details. I have a Nikkor 105mm micro, but the 60mm f/2.8 micro is also a great lens for APS-C cameras. Again, it’s worth thinking about, if it fits your shooting style.

      Good luck!
      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Thanks Matthew for your detailed reply.

        The 70-200mm f/2.8 looks really great. As for now I will still use my current lineup but for the next lens I think it looks great. I’ll rather save up for a quality fast telezoom lens than a cheaper one, especially as I don’t find myself needing it too much at the moment. And even though it’s slightly more expensive, it’ll give me the possibility to upgrade to full frame later on, which I think will be the next step for me after the D5300.

        Thanks again for your advice!

        Reply

    2. Hey Mathhew,

      How are you ?

      Just would like to check few things regarding lenses..

      Except zoom, is there any difference between 18-140 lens and 18-105 lens with D7100 camera ? does it practically make any difference ?

      Reply

      1. Hi Sandy,

        Beside the difference in zoom, there won’t be any significant difference between the 18-105 and the 18-140. They’re both pretty high quality, optically, with only the minor optical issues that you’d expect from any zoom lens.

        If there’s a difference in image quality, it’s the kind of thing that might be detectable in a lab setting, but probably not in practical use.

        – Matt

        Reply

        1. Thanks Mathhew for the quick turn around :)

          I am now very much confused on what to buy between D7100 with 18-105 lens and D5300 with 18-140 lens which are at the same price in B & H. Could you kindly let me know if there are any more important differences to consider. Thanks!

          Advantages of D5300:

          built in wifi
          flip out screen
          better low light performance(due to high ISO). correct me If I am wrong

          Advantages of D7100:

          Weather sealing and stronger build.
          More pro features(which I am not sure I will be using to that extent)

          Reply

    1. Hi Paula,
      Yes, that would have been a hard decision for me, too. The 18-140 is a better lens, though, and the extra reach can be a big help… and I know you’ll be happy with the image quality of the D5300. It’s nice to see your name pop up here!

      -Matthew

      Reply

    2. Hi Matthew,

      Thank you for this great review, much appreciated and I enjoyed reading it. I am a “amateur photographer” in that I do not have much experience with DSLR cameras. My profession in itself is as far away from photography as you can imagine, but I have always been told I have a good eye for great shots and have received compliments for being able to take good pictures using my cell phone, essentially being able to capture “good moments” mainly pictures of people who otherwise would not necessarily be photogenic.

      That said, I believe I will be able to pick up fairly quick on the technical aspects once I get hold of an actual camera. Currently, I am really open to any camera on the market. While I agree with you, that taking a pro-budget approach is ideal, I worry about the fact saving about 200-300 bucks now may hinder in the long-term. It is important to me that the camera I do get is a new release and not an older model.

      This might seem over-burdening to ask, but what would you recommend me to get? If you felt that the choice would narrow down the D7100 or D5300, then through reading several comments, it seems that if an excellent offer is found for the D7100 then I should go for that,

      I am living in Canada and on amazon.ca there are plenty of package offers for both the d5300/d6100 which is quite confusing because they add on a lot of accessories which makes me wonder if those deals are too good to be true.

      I would greatly appreciate it, if you would be able to narrow me down to one best choice and more selfishly, if your actually able to provide me a direct link with amazon.ca of the best offer in your opinion (I hope this does not count as marketing).

      I have been following your website and I can truly say, you have eased a lot of the queries I had into the real of DSLR.

      Thanking you kindly!!

      Yazeed

      Reply

      1. Hello Yazeed,

        You’ve probably already read my comments that say: buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs and the best lenses you can afford. That is my general advice, and that stands :) At least, when budget is a concern. If price were truly no concern, I’d opt for the D810, or even the D750. But that’s a big jump for a first DSLR.

        The D7100 body is available at a pretty reasonable price right now, even on Amazon.ca. I took a quick look at some of their package deals, and they mostly seem to be an attempt to unload junk that doesn’t sell very well by itself. Some of them contain the old 50mm f/1.8D lens, which was replaced a few years ago with the 50mm f/1.8G. Most contain cheap filters (bad idea) and cheap tripods, etc. If I were you, I’d skip the bundle and buy exactly what you want, with high quality components.

        If you’re not positive about what lenses you’ll want to start with, I’d go with an all-around 18-140mm zoom, plus a 50mm f/1.8G or 85mm f/1.8G for portraits. Lens choice is a big decision, so it will take some experience for you to determine what you really need.

        http://www.amazon.ca/Nikon-DX-Format-Digital-18-140mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B00FLXCGJY/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1417543537&sr=8-2&keywords=nikon+d7100

        Good luck!

        -Matthew

        Reply

        1. Hi Michael,

          All I can say is I admire your passion and helpfulness. I read your response and reflected on it. I have the last inquiries below:

          – Given all available camera’s on the market, more specifically between Canon/Nikon, you would recommend that I go for the D7100 and that it is the best currently available, despite it being a year old.
          – I had a look at the link with the offer, that will be the offer I go for if you confirm that it is a great choice.
          – Lastly, any news about when the D7200 will come out? Do you think I should wait for its release or go ahead with the D7100?

          I was wondering if you could have a look at this offer:
          http://www.futureshop.ca/en-CA/product/nikon-nikon-d7100-24-1mp-dslr-camera-with-af-s-dx-nikkor-18-140mm-lens-kit-bag-battery-and-adapter-30639/10327236.aspx?path=78222ec32d49c6e77975dae6e2040e73en02

          Do you think it is a better offer than the amazon one?

          Forgive me for my questions which may seem reassurance seeking, it is just my first DSLR and I really want to make a good investment because I do not want to feel the camera is underperforming in comparison to other competitors for atleast the next 3 years.

          Best,

          Yazeed

          Reply

          1. Hi Yazeed,
            When you start comparing between brands, this discussion can get very contentious. The new Canon 7D Mark II, for example, is better than the Nikon D7100 in several respects, but its sensor may not be as good as that in the D7100… it depends on how you test them. But the new Samsung NX1 beats out the Canon 7D II and D7100 in virtually every area, including shooting 4K video… though it has limited lens and accessory options.

            The truth is, virtually every camera on the market now can out-perform the photographers that are using them. Most people don’t get the best image quality from their cameras because of poor technique, and they miss shots because they aren’t familiar enough with the controls or they don’t know what adjustments to make. What’s really important is getting a camera… any camera… and getting familiar with it, and practicing in tricky situations. More practice beats more camera every time.

            So, if you’ve found a pretty good deal on the D7100, I’d go for it. Even if a D7200 comes out this next year (it might, but I haven’t heard anything yet), it won’t make the D7100 any less of an amazing camera. As for the bundle… it’s really a matter of personal choice. I’d rather have a camera bag that doesn’t look like a camera bag, and that will also hold a tablet or laptop so that I don’t have to carry two bags if I’m going somewhere (a messenger bag like the Manfrotto, or the ONA for a higher end bag, or a backpack)… and rather than using the Nikon Wi-Fi adapter, I like to use an Eye-Fi SD card that can stay in the camera all the time. But again, that’s a matter of personal preference.

            Good luck!
            – Matthew

            Reply

  47. Hi Matthew,

    I am trying to decide between these two cameras. This will be my first DSLR and I will be using my camera primarily for landscape and nature shots. The packages I am looking at include the 18-140mm lens. Is this a good all-around lens to get started, and what are your other recommendations for a decent all-around lens for landscape? Thank-you.

    Reply

    1. Hi Michelle,

      Yes, the 18-140 is a good all-around lens for just about everything. You can get slightly sharper images by using some of the prime lenses instead, but you’ll end up carrying a lot more equipment and spending a lot more money… so the zoom is a good place to start. The 18-105 isn’t too bad either (roughly the same image quality, smaller zoom range), and if you’re considering the D7100, there’s a good “Cyber Monday” deal on the D7100 body and the D7100 + 18-105mm kit on Amazon right now… the D7100 + 18-105 is $996, the same price as the D5300 + 18-140.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  49. Hi Mathew,

    I need help choosing between D5300 and D7100 or better models. Right now I am using D3200 with 18-105mm & 50mm f1.8G lenses. I am interested in doing wedding photography, night shots, bird photography and potraits.

    I am pretty much happy with my current setup. Having seen the prices go down lil bit I think its good time for me to upgrade. What would you suggest me to do ? Should I upgrade to D5300/D7100? Or do you think its better to stick on to D3200 and upgrade my lenses?

    Thanks

    Reply

    1. Hi Ajay,

      If you’ve read many of my comments below, you’ve probably seen that my general advice is to buy the least expensive camera that meets your needs, and the best lenses you can afford. I think that holds true for you, too. Since you’re already using a camera with a great 24 megapixel sensor, upgrading to a new camera will give you little or no improvement in image quality. There will be some improvements in autofocus, and with the D7100, some with flash capabilities, and you’ll have to decide how important those are to your work and how you’re doing with what you have.

      I would opt for some a new lens or two instead… maybe a good macro lens (Nikon’s 60mm or 105mm), or a telephoto, or both: Tamron makes a nice 180mm macro lens. Maybe a wider-angle lens, like the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8. The sigma 18-35mm is great for night shots at events because of its large aperture. The Nikon 85mm f/1.8G would be a great portrait/wedding lens. Many event photographers work with two lenses: a 24-70 f/2.8 and a 70-200 f/2.8. On an APS-C camera, the 24-70 could be replaced with a 17-50mm f/2.8 like Sigma’s. Or if you want more reach for bird photography, any 300mm lens would help (70-300mm zooms are not bad), or you can start saving for a large aperture telephoto like a 400mm f/4. Regardless, any of those lenses will give you capabilities that you don’t have now and make a much bigger difference in your photography than a new camera body.

      Good luck!

      – Matthew

      Reply

  50. Hi Matthews,
    I have the d5300 with the 35mm 1.8 and I want to buy a zoom lens.
    which one you suggest between the 18-140 and the 16-85?
    Which one can give me better sharpness and quality on my snaps?
    Thank you

    Reply

    1. Hey Mirko,

      The 18-140 is not only a newer lens design, it is significantly sharper (at least in the center of the image) than the 16-85. Towards the border of the frame they’re closer in performance, but the 18-140 is still sharper.

      That said, the 16-85 has a shorter zoom range, and is consequently able to control distortion better. The 18-140 has pretty strong barrel distortion at the wide end (well, not terrible, but noticeable… about 3%) and strong pincushion distortion at the telephoto end. The 16-85 is also not great at the wide end (about 2.5%), but at the telephoto end, it’s much less… just a bit over 1%. Both lenses can be corrected pretty easily in Lightroom/ACR, but it’s worth knowing.

      In any case, unless you’re really interested in the 16mm end of the zoom (and don’t mind stopping down to f/4 or 5.6 to get the best image quality), I’d recommend the 18-140 VR.

      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Hi Mathhew,

        I am new to photography. I would like to buy a good camera to shoot my son and family during outside trips. I am looking for the below features. I am confused on whether to buy Nikon D7100 or D5300.

        1. Blur the background a little and get high quality captures.(closeup pics)
        2. High quality close up captures with backgrounds/landscapes.
        3. Capture high quality and clearly visible photographs in low light conditions/during night. I am interested in capturing the lights of cities in the background while shooting closeup pics.

        I might sound little amateurish here due to poor knowledge on photography. I am not very confident on what to buy and hence would like to go with your advice. Thanks!

        Reply

        1. Hi Sandy,

          I think there are a couple of things that I can help with here. First, when it comes to all of the factors that you mention, both cameras are equally high performing. However, most of the things that you mention actually have more to do with the lens choice than the camera. Let me explain:

          1. The blur of the background depends on two things: the aperture you setting on the lens (larger apertures = more blur) and the size of the lens (ie, telephoto lenses will produce more background blur than wide-angle lenses).
          2. Similarly, if you want the background to be clear, you’ll use a wide angle lens with a small aperture… if I understand correctly what you’re after.
          3. Low-light performance does depend on the sensor, but both of these cameras have the same sensor, so you’ll get similar or identical performance. Just as important is the lens you use. A lens that gives you the possibility of a large aperture (f/1.4, 1.8, 2.8, for example… 1.4 is larger) lets in more light than other lenses, so you’ll be able to use a smaller ISO and the image won’t look so grainy and ugly. Most kit lenses are variable: f/3.5 – f/5.6. This means that when the lens is zoomed out to it’s widest setting, the largest aperture available will be f/3.5, but as you zoom in, an f/5.6 would be the largest aperture available. An f/1.4 lens lets in 8 times more light than an f/5.6 lens… which is a big help at night.

          So, let me start by suggesting that you buy the Nikon D5300. My advice is always to buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs and buy the best lenses you can afford; they make a much bigger difference.

          That said, let me also recommend that you either watch my 8 minute video on the 3-Basics (aperture, shutterspeed, ISO) or read my explanation of them, if you prefer to read. This will help you understand my answers above… though I expect you’ll still have some questions, but I’m happy to answer them.

          Good luck!
          – Matthew

          Reply

          1. I believe the comment was posted in wrong place. Hence reposting it…!

            Thanks a lot for your quick and detailed response Mathhew..!!

            That really helps… Could you also suggest the lens that will go hand in hand with D5300 that gives the better performance in accordance with the 3 factors that I am looking for.

            Please post the link of D5300 along with the best suitable lens if handy. Else, I am happy to buy D5300 body and lens separately. Request you to post the separate links if available. Thanks!

            The reason I am looking for the links too is I am not pretty sure on what are the things bundled and which ones are really needed in addition to the camera

            B & H provided lot of accessories included along with Camera while bestbuy/Amazon wont give all.

            Previous Query and answer for reference:

            Hi Mathhew,
            I am new to photography. I would like to buy a good camera to shoot my son and family during outside trips. .I am looking for the below features. I am confused on whether to buy Nikon D7100 or D5300.
            1. Blur the background a little and get high quality captures.(closeup pics)
            2. High quality close up captures with backgrounds/landscapes.
            3. Capture high quality and clearly visible photographs in low light conditions/during night. I am interested in capturing the lights of cities in the background while shooting closeup pics.
            I might sound little amateurish here due to poor knowledge on photography. I am not very confident on what to buy and hence would like to go with your advice. Thanks!

            Hi Sandy,
            I think there are a couple of things that I can help with here. First, when it comes to all of the factors that you mention, both cameras are equally high performing. However, most of the things that you mention actually have more to do with the lens choice than the camera. Let me explain:
            1. The blur of the background depends on two things: the aperture you setting on the lens (larger apertures = more blur) and the size of the lens (ie, telephoto lenses will produce more background blur than wide-angle lenses).
            2. Similarly, if you want the background to be clear, you’ll use a wide angle lens with a small aperture… if I understand correctly what you’re after.
            3. Low-light performance does depend on the sensor, but both of these cameras have the same sensor, so you’ll get similar or identical performance. Just as important is the lens you use. A lens that gives you the possibility of a large aperture (f/1.4, 1.8, 2.8, for example… 1.4 is larger) lets in more light than other lenses, so you’ll be able to use a smaller ISO and the image won’t look so grainy and ugly. Most kit lenses are variable: f/3.5 – f/5.6. This means that when the lens is zoomed out to it’s widest setting, the largest aperture available will be f/3.5, but as you zoom in, an f/5.6 would be the largest aperture available. An f/1.4 lens lets in 8 times more light than an f/5.6 lens… which is a big help at night.
            So, let me start by suggesting that you buy the Nikon D5300. My advice is always to buy the least expensive camera that will meet your needs and buy the best lenses you can afford; they make a much bigger difference.
            That said, let me also recommend that you either watch my 8 minute video on the 3-Basics (aperture, shutterspeed, ISO) or read my explanation of them, if you prefer to read. This will help you understand my answers above… though I expect you’ll still have some questions, but I’m happy to answer them.
            Good luck!
            – Matthew

            Reply

    2. Hi Matthew,

      I am planning to buy between D5300 and D7100. Which one is better to buy for mostly kids and family pictures. I am still amateur but will like to learn. Please let me know.

      Thanks

      Reply

      1. My advice is always this: buy the least expensive camera that meets your needs, and the best lenses that you can afford. The D5300 is a really great camera; unless there’s some feature in the D7100 that you think you’d require, I’d go with the D5300 and spend the difference in price on better lenses; it’s the lenses that are going to make the most difference in your photography.

        It’s funny… I just got an email from Adorama Photo about their Black Friday deal that they want me to promote, so I went ahead and looked at the D5300 there, and it turns out that they’re still exactly the same as the current price on Amazon.com. This seems pretty typical; there are very rarely good holiday deals on the camera equipment that people actually want!

        – Matthew

        Reply

        1. Hey Mathhew,

          My question is slightly similar. However, I would like to have the equally good pictures in low light conditions as well(night time too). I could not understand much regarding the flash functionality drawback you mentioned for D5300 and hence would like to check back..Kindly help. thanks!

          Reply

          1. The differences in flash performance actually don’t make much difference at night; they’ll both be just fine there.

            In order to get the background/ambient light to be a prominent part of your photo, you’ll actually want to use less flash or no flash. Balancing flash and ambient light is a somewhat sophisticated topic, so I can’t explain it in depth here, but I can tell you how to do it: set your camera on aperture priority mode and use the flash as a fill flash… that’s the simple way. Again, both cameras are great at that.

            If you’re interested in why high-speed sync is a concern in daylight situations, I can recommend that you watch my video about flash sync! Its free, of course, like everything on this site :)

            http://www.lightandmatter.org/2011/learn-photography/flash-mechanics-shutter-sync/

            – Matthew

            Reply

      2. Thanks a lot for your quick and detailed response Mathhew..!!

        That really helps… Could you also suggest the lens that will go hand in hand with D5300 that gives the better performance in accordance with the 3 factors that I am looking for.

        Please post the link of D5300 along with the best suitable lens if handy. Else, I am happy to buy D5300 body and lens separately. Request you to post the separate links if available. Thanks!

        The reason I am looking for the links too is I am not pretty sure on what are the things bundled and which ones are really needed in addition to the camera

        B & H provided lot of accessories included along with Camera while bestbuy/Amazon wont give all.

        Reply

        1. Hi Sandy,

          Unfortunately, there’s no single lens that will do everything. There are good lenses that cover large zoom ranges, but they’re not large aperture. There are lots of good prime, large aperture lenses… but they won’t do everything… you’d have to buy a few. The best plan is to get a set of lenses that fits what you want to do.

          And, unfortunately, there’s the matter of budget. Good lenses are expensive, so you’ll have to decide where you want to compromise, if at all.

          (Generally, the free accessories that come with these camera bundles are worth about what you pay for them. Most of it is junk. Sometimes you’ll find something useful in there, though. Amazon and Adorama also have the D5300 with bundled accessories… but generally only with kit lenses. Amazon will throw in a memory card and camera case with a body).

          I’ll give you links to the lenses on Amazon because they’re easiest for me to deal with, but I’ll try to get B&H too.

          I think that a nearly perfect pair of lenses for you would be:

          The Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 Art Series lens : It’s expensive, but it gives you a ton of light and great image quality, and it’s wide angle, which sounds important to you.
          Link to Amazon
          Link to B&H

          The Nikon 85mm f/1.8. This is a nice, large aperture portrait lens. It’s perfect for shooting pictures with a blurry background, or you can adjust the aperture to include a little more background.
          Link to Amazon
          Link to B&H

          Another, less expensive option would be to go with a Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8. It doesn’t have as large an aperture available, but with the exception of the previous lens, it’s as large as apertures get on zoom lenses. Also a good compliment to the portrait lens I mentioned.
          Link to Amazon
          Link to B&H

          Or, if you’re looking for a single lens that you can carry around all the time, that will cover wide angle and telephoto, go ahead and get the Nikon 18-140mm kit lens. It’s not large aperture, but it’s sharp and versatile.
          Link to Amazon
          Link to B&H
          But the bundle at Adorama is probably better…

          Good luck!

          – Matthew

          Reply

          1. Hey Mathhew,

            Thanks for providing the details of cameras. Now that we have an offer going on in Amazon for D7000. I just would like to know which one would be better for me

            D5300 – 696 $ without lens
            D7100 – 649$ with 18-55 Lens

            Kindly suggest

            Reply

            1. I believe you forgot to reply to my post.

              Now that we have offer going on for D7000(200$ less than D5300), would it be a good option to buy D7000 or not ?

              so primarily, my question is D5300 vs D7000 :)

              Reply

              1. Hi Sandy,
                Sorry… your post got lost down here :) I don’t think that I can give you much more insight at this point, assuming that your post above is a typo (D7100 – 649$ with 18-55… that would be an awesome deal).

                You really can’t go wrong either way. Under ideal conditions, the D5300 will have slightly better image quality. The D7000 has a better build quality and has a few more professional-level features like the D7100. It’s really up to you to decide which is more important to you… and of course, whether you want a flip-out LCD screen and a lighter, more compact body, both of which you’ll find on the D5300.

                I’d lean towards the D5300 simply because it’s a newer generation sensor, and that’s important to me.
                – Matthew

              2. Thanks Mathhew for providing me the insight.

                yes its a typo :) sorry for the confusion. Below are the accurate details and the associated links.

                D7000 with 18-140 lens – 799$
                D5300 with 18-140 lens – 996$

                http://www.bestbuy.com/site/nikon-d7000-dslr-camera-with-18-140mm-vr-lens-black/2071002.p

                http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Digital-Camera-18-140mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B00FY3T3TM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1417302183&sr=8-2&keywords=D5300

                The major difference I find is the sensor. D7000 has 16 MP sensor while D5300 has 24 MP sensor.

                I use mostly for taking snaps/videos of my son @ home and my family when we go outdoors. so, would like to go with your advice on whether the 24 mp sensor would be beneficial in my case as well ?

                I dont go for large printing and I use cropping when I upload my photos in facebook. However would like to check on whether I need 24 Megapixel with respect to my usage. or 16 mega pixel would suffice ?

                Would we be able to find the difference between the images that are taken from both the cameras ?

                Also, I read somewhere that, in low light conditions D7000 performs better than D5300. Is that true ?

                I understand the advantages of flip out screen and lighter weight. However I am thinking twice in terms of build and weather sealing capability. As you know, we have 4 months of snowing in US during our holiday season where we get a chance to visit some places :)

                Flip out screen on the other hand is advantageous but in my view its kind of luxury without stretching ourselves while taking snaps/videos. And agree, selfies are not possible without it :)

                Overall, Is the extra 200$ worth in buying D5300 over D7000 ?

                Thanks in advance for your guidance :)

              3. I see. When it comes to low-light performance, it’s hard to compare a 16 and a 24 megapixel sensor; the 24 may produce more noise, but that noise less visible when the images are displayed at the same size because the image is reduced more to get there. From the comparisons I’ve seen between the D7100 and the D7000, they’re pretty comparable in low light, and that holds for the D5300 too. But yes, the D7000 is a little cleaner for those times when you end up cropping.

                16 megapixels is certainly plenty for anything but the largest prints. You could easily publish in magazines and make large prints with a 16 megapixel sensor. And the D7000’s weather sealing is great (but keep in mind that many lenses are not weather sealed), plus it gives you more flash options and lens micro-adjustment, faster shutter speeds, etc. It’s a great camera. If you’ve found a good deal, I’d go for it!

                – Matthew

              4. Thanks Mathhew for your time…!

                I love your website and your candid suggestions…!

                I believe the below sentence that you have posted earlier is with respect to 24 MP vs 16 MP.

                “Under ideal conditions, the D5300 will have slightly better image quality than D7000”

                Kindly let me know if there is any other aspect that I need to consider while going for D7000 over D5300 for about 200$ difference

              6. Hey Mathhew..!

                thanks for the information. Is 18-105 lens as good as 18-140 lens ?

                I already bought D7000 with 18-140 for 800$ in best buy :(

                I can cancel and buy D7100 instead.

              7. Hi Sandy,
                Both are nice lenses; the 18-140 is a little better optically and it has greater zoom range. The 18-105 is not as desirable, which is why you’d be getting it at such a low price.
                – Matt

          2. Is it correct that we do not have to pay taxes on Amazon. We are getting the D7100 bundle at same cost on Adorama & Sam’s club , but we need to pay taxes on these?

            Reply

            1. I’m not sure about that. I live in Seattle, where Amazon.com is based, so I DO have to pay taxes. But out-of-state residents do not, I’m pretty sure… I don’t think I payed sales tax when I was living in Florida.

              Reply

              1. If you live in Florida, you do pay sales tax at Amazon. I think FL passed a law last year that required sales tax on internet purchases. I just bought a Nikon D5300 and the sales tax at Amazon was $69.

  51. Hi Matthew,

    I’m a freelance writer and I want to work on my photography skills to supplement articles. I’d focus on street photography and event coverage. Best Buy has the D5300 (with 18-55mm lens) and the D7000 (with 18-140mm lens) for about the same Black Friday price, so while I had originally planned to buy the D5300, I’m now stumped! I’m concerned about being able to change settings quickly with the D5300, as it seems easier to change settings without the menu on the D7000. Since the D7000 has body autofocus, there are more lens options. In the D5300 camp, I like the idea of a lighter, newer model, since I travel and this will be my only camera for the next few years. But what about RAW? From this article, it looks like the D7100 is comparable to the D5300, but is the D7000 comparable too? Which camera would you go for?

    Thanks for your time– I love your website!
    -Jillian

    Reply

    1. Hi Jillian,

      Let me start by saying that all three of them are great cameras (5300, 7000, 7100). Although the D5300/7100 are technically going to give you the possibility of sharper images, there are very few instances in which that will actually make a practical difference… you’d either have to do a LOT of cropping, or you’d have to be printing your images very large. If you’re shooting for the web and publishing images that are full screen size (which is uncommon in itself), a full HD image is 1920 x 1280 or 1080 pixels… right around 2 megapixels, so the quality difference between these cameras is completely inconsequential. So, keep that in mind.

      The Nikon D7000 is a 16 megapixel camera. When it was released, it was very well respected for its good low-light performance and image quality. The D5300 is a 24 megapixel, so it can capture higher resolution (if you give it sharp enough input to capture… use the sharpest lenses, best technique, etc… which is harder than it sounds).

      The D7000 and D7100 do both have a built-in focus motor, but to be honest, that shouldn’t be a big concern. Most of the Nikon lenses made since the year 2000 have motors, and their older lenses are not going to give you the quality that digital shooters have come to expect (we can zoom in to the pixel-level soooo much easier than we could on the grain of our film).

      As far as being able to change settings quickly on the fly… that is a major concern, as is the fit of the camera in your hand. You should get a camera that is intuitive and comfortable for you. That said, most news photographers shoot in aperture priority mode. The only things that you’ll need to change on the fly are (1) the aperture, which you can do on any DSLR with the main dial, and (2) the exposure compensation. The D5300 and D7000 both have a button on top near that shutter button to do that. That’s how I shoot, probably 90% of the time. The D5300 is on par with the others there.

      The rest of the time I shoot in full-manual mode. There, it’s helpful to have one dial for the shutter speed and one for the aperture, and the D7000/7100 have that, but the D5300 does not. I shoot in manual mode in the studio, when I’m using flash equipment, and also when I’m shooting indoor sports where the lighting is even (like in a gym), where I’ll set the correct exposure at the beginning of the game and then just leave it. In both cases, it’s less critical that I’d need super-quick access to full manual controls. So, for the way I shoot, the D5300 would be fine, but you’ll need to think about how you shoot. And keep in mind that the D5300 does have a limitation when it comes to high-speed sync, as mentioned in the article above.

      If you shoot RAW, virtually all of the other camera settings are “set and forget”. I change the ISO sometimes, too, but that is also equally easy to change among these models.

      What’s going to make the biggest difference in your photography is really not going to be the body… it’s going to be your lenses. I would definitely go for an 18-140mm over the 18-55, but to get the best images (especially for events) you’ll want large aperture lenses (f/2.8 and larger). But of course, they’re expensive… that might take some time. My general advice is always to buy the least expensive body that will meet your needs, and buy the best lenses that you can afford. So, from the choices you mention, I’d probably go with the D7000 with the better lens. Either way, you’ll be in good shape, though. The important thing is to get a camera in your hands and start shooting, practice every day at the things you’re having trouble with, and get familiar with the camera. It’s the photographer that matters, in the end.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  52. Matthew, first of all, thanks for all your help. You responded to some of my earlier questions and your answers were incredibly helpful. I ended up buying the D7100 and have been incredibly happy with the camera. I dragged it along with me on an African safari and all over the Colorado mountains and everything in between. I bought the kit with both the 18-140 and 55-300 lenses. I spend a fair amount of time in the mountains & desert and I am looking to buy a wide angle lens to complement my existing lenses.

    Do your recommendations at the following link still stand?

    http://www.lightandmatter.org/2011/lens-recommendations/nikon-lens-recommendations/wide-angle-zoom-2/

    By way of background, I am a hack who is having fun fumbling my way through the whole photography thing – basically teaching myself as I go. I am growing with the D7100. The Nikor lens in your link above sounds amazing, but I am wondering whether at that price point I should hold off until my skill level catches up to the lens. The Tokina sounds great as well, and obviously at an easier to stomach price point, but do you think it will perform well enough for my intended use?

    And obviously any other lens recommendations are welcome. After the wide angle, I will be looking to pick up a prime lens more for portrait type work.

    Last, are you seeing any compelling Black Friday deals?

    Thanks again. This site and your work is incredibly helpful.

    Reply

    1. Hi Ryan,

      The Nikon 14-24 f/2.8 is still an awesome lens, but it’s a bit of a waste on an APS-C camera like the D7100, since it is designed for a full frame sensor, and you’re paying for all of that (much more difficult) engineering and heavy glass.

      I would definitely recommend the Tokina 11-16mm, especially if you want something to shoot events and want an f/2.8 aperture. There’s an updated version of the lens, the Tokina AT-X 11-16mm f/2.8 Pro DX II but the differences are minimal… so if you run across a good price on the original, go for it.

      If you’re OK with a more modest maximum aperture, the Nikon 10-24mm is fine but not great, the Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 is astoundingly wide and the image quality is very good, and the Sigma 10-20mm is also fine… about in line with the Nikon.

      Incidentally, if you don’t need anything quite so wide, another awesome lens that’s available now is the Sigma 18-35 f/1.8. Again, it’s especially good for people who shoot in low light, not on a tripod, but in addition to the huge f/1.8 aperture, it’s very very sharp.

      I haven’t seen a lot of deals that are worth getting excited about, yet. Usually the good stuff ( higher end bodies and lenses) don’t really go on sale, though they might throw in free shipping or other junk to the order. But I’ll keep my eyes open!

      – Matt

      Reply

      1. I was almost sure of buying a Nikon D5300 with 18-140 lens, my mind has changed since I read reviews of Sony alpha 6000 or alpha 5100 mirrorless camera. They are comparatively smaller & with equally good quality. Which is a good lens to buy with Alpha 6000. How does it compare to DSLR D5300.

        Reply

        1. Hi Archna,

          I’ve spent a good deal of time using the Sony a6000, and it’s a very nice camera for what it is… but it’s not a replacement for a DSLR. The image quality is quite good, but since it does have an AA filter, the 24mp sensor will not be quite as sharp as that on the Nikon D5300… though the difference is probably negligible. My problem with the a6000 is that, compared to any DSLR, it’s very difficult to change the autofocus points that are used, and the autofocus is slow for shooting action… it can’t keep up with an SLR. For casual use, though, it would be among my top choices for a compact camera…. maybe the top. The other problem is lens quality. The 16-50mm that is the workhorse for that Sony has very heavy distortion and vignetting, and although the camera will correct that in JPGs, it still degrades quality…. and there’s a much smaller range of high quality optics available for the camera in general. You’ll need to decide whether you want the convenience of a smaller camera (though lenses are still bulky) or the quality of a DLSR.

          Reply

          1. Thanks Mathew for the quick response. But I am still confused. I have been using a Canon Point & shoot 20x optical zoom camera. So this will be my first DSLR or ML. So which one should I go for. Which lenses would be better than 16-50 for sony a6000. I am not limited on budget but want to get the best of D5300 or D7100 or Sony a5100 or Sony a6000. Which lense is good for D7100.

            Reply

          2. Thanks Mathew for the quick response. I have using a point and shoot camera till now & this will be my first DSLR or ML camera. Budget is not a problem for me & I want to choose the best between Nikon D5300 , Nikon 7100 , Sony a5100 or Sony a6000. Which lenses would be better than 16-55 for a6000. Pl suggest some good lens for Nikon D7100. I am quiet confused as each camera has its pros & cons

            Reply

            1. I wish I could give you a simple answer, but there isn’t one. It really depends on what you want out of a camera, and how serious you are about being a photographer.

              If you want the best camera, the Nikon D7100 is the best of the options you’ve mentioned. Best autofocus, best image quality (though the a6000 can shoot more frames per second). The D5300 has identical image quality, and is almost as good otherwise, and lighter.

              The Sony is more compact and easier to carry around, also has great image quality, though fewer flash and lens options. It would be hard to use it to replace a professional camera for sports or wildlife in particular, while either of the Nikons would be fine in the hands of a professional. There’s no better option than the 16-55 that I know of as a wide to mid-range zoom, but there are several prime lenses that are good.

              Again, all I can say is that each as their advantages… and you’ll have to pick which is more important to you.

              The same is true of lenses. Lenses are like a painter’s brushes… they serve different purposes, and you have to pick the right one for what you want to do.

              If you want a single lens that can offer you some flexibility, Nikon’s 18-140mm VR is really nice, covers a great range with great image quality… but all lenses have their drawbacks. Other good lenses are the 85mm f1.8, 60mm f/2.8 Micro, the 70-200 f/2.8 VR II, just to name a few.

              – Matt

              Reply

  54. Dear Matthew,

    I bought a D5300 and have one day left to be able to return it, I have large hands and because of this I believe the D7100 will be better for me, but am concerned about buying the aged model, I understand in a couple of months Nikon will release the D7200 which will address some issues, and may have an articulated display, I mostly use the viewfinder on my camera, but the articulated display allows me to protect the display from damage and is nice to have the possibility to move the display as needed. I just can’t be sure if I should keep the D5300 ( which feels small for my hands ) and does not have a built in focus motor and has many settings that need to be done through the display, but is less expensive, is the latest technology and is lighter.
    It is a tough decision to make, please help me

    Thanks,
    Fernando

    Reply

  56. Hi Matthew
    Thanksalot for the informations you are sharing with us. I have one question
    I have nikon 5100 with 50 mm 1.8 lense and 18-105 vr lense and it’s time to upgrade
    I have two choices
    Nikon 7100 body only with my old lenses and sigma 10-20 lense coz I am crazy with landscape.
    Canon 7d with original 18-135 kit lense
    I searched a lot and found the picture quality and less noise at high Iso is going to nikon 7100 is that true?
    What I will feel if I purchased 18-140 vr lense over my 18-105 lense I already have if I bought nikon d7100
    Thanks

    Reply

  57. Hi Mathew ! Great work indeed. Please solve my split as to far and to what extent the better processor placed in D 5300 tilts the decision in its favour ?

    Reply

    1. When it comes to image quality, the image processor only makes a difference if you shoot JPG, in which case it can help speed up processing for noise reduction and image processing in general, though it won’t necessarily improve the image quality, it could potentially. That doesn’t seem to be the case with the D5300; image quality is about the same.

      If you shoot RAW (and you should), then there’s no difference in image quality; the processor is not a significant factor; image processing takes place in Lightroom (or whatever RAW engine you prefer).

      Otherwise, the processor can make a difference in the frame rate of the camera, the autofocus performance, etc, and as you can see in the table above, having a newer processor helps the D5300 get closer to matching the D7100, but it certainly does not surpass it.

      – Matthew

      Reply

      1. Dear Matthew ! I greatly value your blitzkrieg response. Feel like becoming your permanent student and then working under you.
        Best Regards,
        Ijaz

        Reply

      2. Dear Matthew, I greatly value your blitzkrieg response. Feel like becoming your permanent student and then working under you.
        Best Regards,
        Ijaz

        Reply

    2. Dear Matthew, I greatly value your blitzkrieg response. Feel like becoming your permanent student and then working under you.
      Best Regards,
      Ijaz

      Reply

  58. Dear Mattew
    First i have to thank you for this review which i found the most helpful one to compare between D5300 and 7100.

    I am willing to buy either D5300 or D7100, but as I was shooting with D3100 “Much less focusing points” and lag of speed. I really want to purchase a camera that is more faster and precise while focusing and I cant find the answer to my question.

    which is faster while focusing the D5300 of D7100 ?

    I am willing to shoot indoor weddings in which the place is with low light and crowded with many people and always moving.

    Reply

    2. Hi Mohamed,

      Sorry I missed your question the first time around!

      To begin with, the speed of the focusing primarily depends on the lens that you use; most of the AF modules in the cameras can achieve focus in about the same time. The D7100 will be a little bit more responsive, and since it has more AF points, it may be easier to get a lock on your subject, which can lead to faster AF performance.

      In low light, you’ll also get a boost in performance by using large aperture lenses (f/2.8 or larger… f/1.4 is even better). This lets more light get to the AF module while you’re trying to pull focus, which makes the process easier for the camera, so it’s more reliable… and of course, it also gives you better shutter speeds for less motion blur.

      – Matthew

      Reply

  59. Just wanted to thank you for this article. I am planning to buy either the D5300 or the D7100 in the next few months. Your article I think has convinced me that for me the best way to go may be the D5300. Great information in your article.

    Reply

  60. Hi Matthew,

    Thanks for the informative review. Based on your advice, buying the least expensive body and invest more on quality lenses and also considering the built-in focus motor in D7100, doesn’t that mean I can buy wide range of quality lenses lacking built-in focus motor for less money compared to D5300? For D5300 I have to go for AF-S lenses while lenses with same specification lacking focus motor are cheaper. What do you suggest?

    thank again :)

    Reply

    1. Of course you’re right that you’ll need modern lenses if you want to use autofocus with a D5300. If you think that you’ll want to use older lenses (some of them are good… and they can be inexpensive, especially used), then that’s definitely a consideration. I happen to have an old 80-200 f/2.8, 35-70 f/2.8, and 105mm micro that are all from the 1990s and don’t have AF motors. They’re slow focusing compared to lenses with motors built in, but they certainly work… though they may not be quite as sharp as modern lenses. I’d take some time and decide which lenses you think you’ll want to use, figure out the costs, and decide that way.

      – Matt

      Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *