Canon EOS 6D with Battery Grip

Canon EOS 6D Announced: Canon’s Entry Level Full Frame SLR

This morning, Canon announced the EOS 6D, an “entry-level”, full-frame sensor SLR to fit into its line-up below the 5D series cameras. The camera is built around a newly designed 20 megapixel sensor with an impressive native ISO range, from 100-25,600, expandable to 102,400.  The price is currently listed as $1,299.00, virtually identical to that of the recently announced Nikon D600. The 6D is expected to start shipping in October.

Where did Canon skimp to keep the price about $1300 lower than the 5D Mark III? It appears that the major hit was with the focusing system. Instead of the 5D’s awesome 61-point AF smodule, the 6D has an 11-point system (one cross-type), only marginally better than that found in the older 5D Mark II. Canon does claim, however, that it can focus in very low light: -3EV (half the light needed to focus the 5D Mark III). And although the 6D shares the same Digic 5+ processor with the 5D Mark III, the 6D can shoot bursts at only 4.5 frames per second (vs. 6fps in the 5D III). The 6D’s loss of 2 megapixels in resolution is probably negligible, especially considering its remarkable low-light performance compared to the Mark II.

Like the Nikon D600, the Canon 6D’s shutter module is also limited to a top speed of 1/4000th sec, and more disappointingly, an X-sync speed of 1/180th sec, slightly slower than the 5D Mark II.

The body construction of the 6D is also significantly different from earlier full-frame models. Much like the Nikon D600 and D7000, the Canon 6D’s  body is partially metal (magnesium alloy) and polycarbonate plastics, allowing it to be smaller and lighter than other full frame models; the body alone weighs 680g (24 oz.), much less than the 5D Mark III (860g, 30.3 oz), and even the APS-C sensor 7D (820g, 29 oz). This robust composite body is also sealed against dust and weather.

There are, of course, other minor differences, too. The 6D accepts SD cards only, there are no slots for Compact Flash. The viewfinder offers about 97% coverage (compared to the Mark IIII’s 100%), but at the same level of magnification.

Canon also made some additions. The Canon 6D is the first EOS SLR to feature built-in GPS tracking to allow easy geo-tagging, and it also has built-in wireless connectivity, also a first in Canon SLRs.

All in all, the camera looks like (mostly) a step up from the 5D Mark II, at a lower cost… not a bad deal. Still, it’s a little hard to swallow paying over $2000 for an “entry-level” camera with shutter speeds matched by the “Rebel” line, and only 11 AF points.

Editor-in-Chief
  1. Hi Matthew,

    Thanks for the review. I’m an amature photographer and am finally ready to upgrade to a full-frame camera. I can’t afford the Canon 5D Mark III and was considering the Mark II before I’ve heard the news and read your review. B&H is offering a deal on their Mark II model that ends this Saturday. So, should I purchase the Mark II for $1,782 today or wait for the 6D to come out? I understand it’s lighter, newer, etc., but is it worth the extra $400?

    Thanks! Natasha

    1. I see that at B&H, the 5D Mark II is only $1799 at the moment. That’s a great deal, actually. I think it really depends on what type of photography you’re planning on doing. The 6D should have somewhat improved low-light performance, and it’s frame-rate is a little faster, but their AF systems are about the same (the 5D has 9 AF points, but also 6 additional ones in the central area that can’t be selected manually).

      I’d probably only hold out for the 6D if you plan on doing quite a bit of very low light photography, or if you’ll also be shooting some specific action sequences in which that extra half frame or so per second would make a difference, or if the GPS or Wi-Fi are important to you. To me, those kinds of things are benefits, but not things that I’d base a camera decision on.

      Good luck!

      – Matthew

       

  2. That 180th maximum sync speed is very disappointing, especially since I imagine that at least some people will also be comparing it with the 7D, and the difference between being able to use a flash at 180th vs 250th seems significant. The more I think about it, the more it seems odd that this newer camera would be behind the 7D in so many ways (slower shutter, slower shooting speed, no flash, fewer cross-type focus points, no CF card, etc.).

    Do you think this means that there won’t be a 7D Mark II, Matt? When I first heard about the 6D, I had the idea that the plan was to run two parallel lines for around the same price (6D and 7D), where one would be full frame and higher megapixels for slower landscape type work, and one APS-C but faster focusing, faster shooting, etc.  But assuming that there is a 7D MkII and Canon incorporates its new high-ISO performance technology into the new APS-C sensor, it seems to me like all the 6D is left with is the larger sensor.  Not that the larger sensor isn’t a bit deal, but it just seems like a 7DII juiced with the new high-ISO technology would have so many additional benefits as to overwhelm the 6D with anyone but very specialized tripod/landscape shooters. … (?)

    1. Hey Mike,

      Rumors are that the Canon 7D Mark II will be announced sometime in January, and that it will replace both the 7D and the 60D… the implication being that Canon will be ramping down their APS-C line… though I’m a little skeptical of that, especially with the “entry level” full frame model still over $2000. It would have to mean that the new 7D would be placed somewhere around $1000-1200, and that doesn’t make much sense.

      Anyway, the new 7D is rumored to be aiming at 10fps, and somewhere around 20MP with better low-light technology. Guess we’ll see.

      Regarding the 6D’s max sync speed… 1/180th is more annoying than anything else, to me. It’s only a hair slower than the 5D series (which are 1/200th). 1/200th is 1/3 stop slower than 1/250th, and 1/180th is 1/2 stop… so light-wise, it’s the difference of 1/6th stop, which is pretty close to negligible, and neither 1/200th nor 1/180th is fast enough to stop much action when ambient light is factored in, so again, it’s not much difference… and when you’re using HSS, of course there’s no difference. But it does LOOK bad on a spec sheet, and if they’d bumped it up to 1/200th, it still wouldn’t have eaten into 5D sales because of the AF system.

      So, all in all, I think the 6D is still a very attractive camera for the Canon portrait or landscape photographer; particularly studio photographers who shoot with flash, since the sync speed doesn’t make any difference in the studio (when all the light is strobe, the shutter speed doesn’t matter, as you know).

      – Matt

    1. Keith,

      Of course you’re right, the 6D does not have a built-in flash. However, none of the other full-frame cameras do either… so I’m not sure it really counts as a way that costs were reduced :)

      -Matthew

      1. The d600 is a full frame with built-in flash that can trigger other flashes. How much this should influence price of a full frame camera is anyone’s guess.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *