Canon 1DX Body

Canon Announces EOS 1DX : A Unified, Professional Body

Although it is not the 5D Mark III that everyone has been waiting for, the new Canon EOS 1DX will certainly make its share of waves. With this morning’s announcement of the new 1DX, Canon has unified the 1D and 1Ds lines of cameras, replacing the 1Ds Mark III and the 1D Mark IV. In doing so, Canon had to build a camera that matched the speed and responsiveness of the Mark IV, and combine it with the image quality and flexibility of the Mark III. The result is a powerhouse that I predict will instantly be a favorite for journalists, cinematographers, and many other professionals as well.

At the heart of the 1DX is a new 18-megapixel, full-frame CMOS sensor. It seems that Canon has listened to the pros (and the marketplace) and instead of making a higher-resolution sensor, they concentrated on improving image quality, particularly at high-ISO. The lower resolution sensor allows Canon to use larger receptors (which have also been engineered for superior signal to noise ratio), allowing the sensor to operate at a native ISO range of 100-51200, plus an expanded range (H1 and H2) of 102400 and 204800!

Canon EOS 1DX with 70-200 f2.8 IS II

The camera is powered by three processors: dual Digic-5+ processors for image and video processing, plus a Digic-4 dedicated solely to metering and auto-focus. Canon claims that their new Digic-5+ processors have 17 times the processing power of the previous generation. This power, coupled with a newly engineered carbon-fiber shutter system, allows the 1DX to shoot full resolution JPG files at 14 frames per second (in super high speed mode), faster than any other camera on the market. It shoots RAW files at a mere 12 frames per second.  The AF system uses 61 cross-type p0ints, and is now capable of what Canon is calling “iTR AF” : intelligent subject tracking. iTR AF can detect faces and insure that they remain in focus, but is also detects other blocks of color, making AF of moving objects much more reliable. At least in theory. Time will tell how the system performs in the field, but Canon’s AF systems have rarely disappointed in the past.

It’s not surprising that Canon has also catered to the rapidly growing demographic of SLR Film-Makers. Probably of greatest interest here are the new recording formats; the previous h264 codec was hard to work with in post-production, and image quality was not always up to movie industry standards. The 1DX offers two new HD recording formats, one aimed at producing files that are easy to edit, and another with an emphasis on high image-quality compression. Furthermore, the 4GB file size limit has been overcome, allowing continuous recording for up to 29 minutes 59 seconds. Rather than using a different file system (like NTFS), Canon’s software seamlessly splits a video file into 4GB segments on the fly.

PRICE: $6800, estimated street price. Canon says that they’ll start shipping in March 2012, nearly 5 months from now. This is common practice for Nikon, but I’ve never seen Canon announce a camera so long before release.

And this is just the beginning. Over the next few days, I’ll be updating and discussing the new features and innovations found in the Canon EOS 1DX. Stay tuned!

Back view of Canon 1DX

 

 

Editor-in-Chief
  1. What I want for Christmas…

    1Dx and PIXMA Pro-1. Oh, and a 70-200mm f/2.8L Mk II. That’s it. I guess if I put away all the money that I use to rent it so often, I *may* be able to buy it.

  2. Wow!

    It looks like Canon has finally (albeit still a quite a while after Nikon) caught on to the fact that high ISO performance is quite possibly THE #1 priority for a lot of photographers. For folks who work mostly in lit studios or doing landscapes on tripods maybe it’s not a big deal, but for someone like me who takes lots of pictures of kids running around in low light, the ability to go up to something like 25K ISO with low noise would be AMAZING!

    What’s your guess on when this concept will filter down to the more modestly-priced Canons, Matt? In particular, I’m wondering about the 7D, where I’m now guessing that the will not be going for 20MP as some had speculated, but rather that some of this high-ISO magic will be built in to the 7D-MarkII (or whatever might be coming out that is above the 60D but below the 5DMkIII). From googling around, I see that a lot of people expected the new 7D in 2011, but quite a few others are saying probably not until late 2012.

    I wonder if the fact that Canon announced the 1DX so far in advance means that it’s safe to assume that they will be doing this for their other DSLRs (i.e. that a new camera in the 7D range probably wouldn’t be out before March 2012 because otherwise they would have announced it already)?

    What’s your best guess?

    1. As for what’s to become of the rest of Canon’s lines… it’s hard to say. Until now, Canon has basically had 3 pro bodies: the 5d, the 1D and the 1Ds, designed for quality but not speed, speed but not quality, and quality and some speed (respectively, and completely over-simplified). With the combination of the 1D and 1Ds line, Canon could basically make the 5D a studio camera and the 1D a field camera, and actually make the 5D higher resolution than the 1D.

      Canon actually announced last year that the 18 megapixel would be the highest resolution that they would develop for APS-C, so I haven’t been concerned about them going crazy there (though obviously Sony has… 24 megapixel APS-C, and they’ve been well received).

      But your guess is as good as mine :)

      Since we have mentioned that Canon has been slow to catch on about high-ISO performance, it’s worth keeping in mind that 2 years ago, Canon reduced their sensor resolution when they released the PowerShot G11 to 10 megapixels (from 15 in the G10), ostensibly to improve low-noise performance, and they IMPROVED the noise performance of their sensors when they went from 15 to 18 megapixels. And, of course, Nikon has been limited by using sensors made by another company, so to give them credit for making the right choice might be going too far; they have done a great job of marketing their strengths, though.

      1. Thanks Matt. I hadn’t thought about the improvement when they went from 15 to 18. I guess I just generally picture the two as having an inverse relationship, but I guess maybe that’s not necessarily right.

        I had also forgotten that Nikon buys their sensors from Sony, but it seems like it would be hard to know (from the outside) how much of the push to focus on ISO came from them — i.e. to know to what extent Nikon says “Yeah, we’ll take whatever design you decide to make” and to what extent Nikon tells Sony “High-ISO performance is our priority; so make us those kind of sensors or we’ll find another vendor.”

        It does seem like the 5D Mark II should be next in line for the upgrade, but like you said — who really knows. I am glad that I’m not in the position to be shopping for the top of the line range though — because if a person wanted a high end DSLR right now it must drive them crazy to know that this 1Dx is out there — but that it’s still almost 6 months away! :)

        1. And the funny thing was that with the PowerShots, there actually wasn’t an image quality improvement by going down to 10 megapixels. So, even though it’s generally true that higher pixel-density = more noise, the sensor design in general is more important.

          I’m sure you’re right that Nikon had quite a bit of input into the R&D of Sony’s sensors.

          I see that Canon is offering rebates on the 5D Mark II these days (not huge, though)… which sometimes signals that they’re getting rid of stock. So maybe the 5D III will be coming soon.

          1. Yeah, that’s gonna drive me crazy. I hate obsolescence. Right now, I’m looking at my iPhone 4 with disdain. :-)

  3. Must……..have………Canon 1Dx!

    Um, anybody want to buy a slightly used Canon 5d Mk II AND Canon 7D? :-)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *